Laserfiche WebLink
Engineer Raattkka stall, rd that since this plat first l~'m.e in, the City has <br />adopted a new Code, effective January l, 1978. The sotls ordinance is much <br />more stringent and that it would create a problem to several lots on this <br />plat and the street right of way is not allowed to be included in the <br />total lot area and this does affect some of the lots. <br /> <br />Attorney Goodrich said Council would have to waive.the six month time <br />limit for final plat in order to grant this extension. <br /> <br />Attorney Nielson ~poke on behalf of Barthel's 2nd Addition. He said pre- <br />liminary approval was given on 1/23/78, and th'at final approval should have <br />been obtained by 7/23/78, further, that this was no fault of the City~ During <br />the months of August, September and October there had been contact with <br />the City staff and at that time 'the developer's contract was lacking and the <br />engineer's figures were lacking for the development contract. A request has <br />been previously made by the Council that for access onto Highway 47 the <br />developer also blacktop a road in his other plat which he has agreed to <br />do. Mr. Nielson said he and the de~eloper were unaware of the change in the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Ne. said the plat was done in 1977 prior to the change in the ordinance and <br />preliminary approval was given under the old ordinance. They are asking <br />for a one-month extension of time, and the engineer needs Council to <br />authorize his giving figures for the development contract. <br /> <br />Councilman Reimann asked if he could conform to the other things in the plat <br />as per the present ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Nielsoh said some of the lots would comply and some do not comply. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Cox seconded by May6r Gamec that based on the concerns <br />of the Council the request be denied and ask staff to prepare findings of fact <br />for the nex.t meeting the reason being that the soils requirements were the <br />reason the City adopted the ordinance and the lot sizes were prior to the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilman Cox said that this would just.be staying consistent with the present <br />ordinance and the City staff and engineer should review it. Ordinances are <br />enacted .now that govern lot sizes. <br /> <br />Councilman Sorteberg said the proposed lot sizes .are not far from meeting <br />the requirement. <br /> <br /> Councilman Reimann concurred. : <br /> <br />Councilman Cox withdrew the motion. <br />Councilman Gamec withdrew the second. <br /> <br /> Motion was rescinded. <br /> <br /> Mo t.~ oQ_by-~o uncTi.' 1 m.a~.'.C~~- May06' G ~ ~e'C' 'it..o~.g r.-~ fit ~t~a n~" exte ns t on.-.~ ~ <br />._. :h rough.~y. '.~ ~..)979 ~or,' Ba rthe~ :~nd: RUmba o.~-~ontt ngent-:on ;ia) d. ~] ~' <br />/~',.~omplying'~'th~the~x(~ng~6~d~'~e~~Y~b~'e~Oi'~e~{~ ~lat to <br /> <br /> Motion carried. Voting yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilman Cox, Council~n Reimann <br /> and Councilman Sorteberg. Voting no: None. . <br /> <br /> <br />