Laserfiche WebLink
PAGE 1 <br />PUBLIC HEARING ' <br />MAY 29, ~979 <br />STREET IMPROVEMENT <br /> <br /> PUBLIC HEARING <br /> CITY OF RAMSEY <br />ANOKA COUNTY <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof the'Ramsey City Council held·apublic <br />hearing at 15153 Nowthen Boulevard N.W., Ramsey, Minnesota 5530'3~-on·May 29, 1979. <br /> <br />Members Present: <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec <br />coUncilman Cox <br />Councilman Mickelson <br />Councilman.Reimann <br />Councilman Sorteberg <br /> <br />Others Present: City Engineer'Peter Raatikka <br /> City Attorney'William Goodrich <br /> City'Administrator'L1oyd Schne] <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec called the public hearing.to order at 7:30.p.m. and ledlthe Pledge Of' <br />Allegiance to the Flag. <br /> <br />Engineer Raatikka explained the project and cost estimates with reference to the <br />improvement of Jaspar Street N.W. lying between Ramsey Blvd., and 163rd Avenue <br />N.W., 159th Lane·N.W. lying between Jaspar Street N.W. and Ironstone Street' <br />N.W., 160th Lane N.W. lying between~Jaspar.Street'N.W, and Ironstone. Street'.N~W.~ <br />Ironstone Street N.W. lying between·159th Lane N.W. and' 160th'Lane N.W,, 160th· ' <br />Lane N.W. lying in Section 15 TOWnship 32 Range 25 west of'Jaspar Street~ 161st <br />Lane N.W. lying between Jaspar Street'N.W, and Kamacite Street'N.W., 162nd Lane <br />N.W..lying between Ramsey Blvd. N.W. and Jaspar Street'byimprovlng street'to.' <br />a five ton rating and bituminous sumfacing. <br /> <br />Engineer Raatikka further stated that the drainage would remain the same;'any <br />driveway culverts that are required will'be the responsibility of the'owner'to <br />purchase and install; driveways that are three leer'or'clOser'to the'roadway <br />will be connected by the project, others would be·~he'resPOnsibility of the'· <br />owner to install and pay for·. <br /> <br />Mr. Bill Erickson, 161st Lane, asked how far on 161st the road will be installed. <br /> <br />Engineer Raatikka explained that it would be as far as it is graded now. <br /> <br />Judy Martens, 161st Lane said that his area wasn't included in the petition <br />because she was told that time was limited to getting it submitted and she didn't <br />have time to take the petition any further, it was up to the persons in that area <br />to take the petition around if they wanted the improvement. <br /> <br />Mr. Erickson asked what it would take to get his road done then. <br /> <br />Councilman Cox explained that there was a deadline so the p~oject could be included <br />on the assessment role for this year, However, he would like to see·the whole <br />development done if there is ~ome way to arrange it. <br /> <br />Mrs. Bowman said she had talked to some of the people on that' street and they <br />didn't want it done. , <br /> <br /> <br />