My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/23/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 07/23/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:38:41 PM
Creation date
8/11/2004 2:25:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/23/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mm.' Hedstrom stated that most of his trucks come in the back way. <br /> <br />Ben Deemer said that by requiring Mr. Hedstrom to install this fence, the <br />only hardhip created would be on the adjacent property owners who have been <br />cutting through Hedstrom's property. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson recommends that Front Street matching easement be <br />extended to the West property line. <br /> <br />Mr. Hedstrom indicated he would dedicate the street easement. <br /> <br />Discussion was held regarding the variance that was granted by the City <br />Council for a setback of 27 feet from the rear property line. <br /> <br />Administrator Schnelle stated that Council allowed him a setback of 27 <br />feet and therefore the parking should hot be extedded past the end of the <br />b~ilding. <br /> <br />Ron West and Ben Deemer stated they a re in favor of running the parking area <br />up to the fence which is five feet off the property line. <br /> <br />Ben Deemer asked Mr. Hedstrom about the drainage and which way the surface <br />water flows off the property and said that by using this area for parking lot <br />that he could put in a curb to direct water runoff. <br /> <br />Engineer Raatikka stated that he should provide the City with a grading plan <br />of this area for drainage purposes. <br /> <br />P & Z recommends that a 20 foot private drive behind building No. 4 shohld <br />be installed which will blend into the parking %or area which.ends at the <br />end of Building No. 3. The rest of the area will be green area with grass to <br />be either seeded or sod. There is to.be no parking or storage of materials <br />on the private drive. <br /> <br />The drainage to the manhole from B6ilding No. 3 on Exhibit No. i is to be <br />deleted. <br /> <br />Regarding the exterior appearance of the buildings, Ron West said that <br />the Design and Site Plan Con~nittee met la, Friday and discussed metal <br />buildings and they are working up a formula that so much of the metal <br />building exterior has to t~ faced in something other than metal on those buildings <br />facing the street or adjacent to other structures. <br /> <br />Mr. West said he would like to see Building No. 3 dressed up with something <br />other than metal at least 40 to 60 percent. <br /> <br />P & Z recommends that Building No. 3 be a pole-type construction with a blue <br />metal exterior faced with wood~ stucco, r~ugh cedar or something comparable <br />in columns which are four feet in width and placed perpendicular from the <br />ground to the soffits of the building. .Said four foot columns are to be placed <br />in the canter of the East and West sides and on each corner-of the building <br />except the South side (because this side is hidden by the existing trees) to <br />break up a monotonous appearance. <br /> <br />Building No. 2 is to be a pole-type construction and the P & Z Commission <br /> <br /> -5- <br />Regular Meeting P & Z - 7/~/79 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.