My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/23/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 07/23/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:38:41 PM
Creation date
8/11/2004 2:25:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/23/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Lloyd Schnelle <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />first and second maximum amounts are higher as compared to non-senior, <br />non-disabled claimants. In the example, the senior citizen's two maximum <br />amounts were $850 and $1,000 respectively, while the maximum amounts for <br />the non-senior, non-disabled claimant (with the same household income) <br />were $650 and $1,000 respectively. While there is always a difference <br />between the maximum circuit-breaker amounts allowed at a given income level <br />for senior versus non-senior claimants, the amount of difference varies at <br />different income levels (see enclosed sheet). On a statewide basis for ' <br />claims filed in 1978, the difference between the average Property Tax <br />Refund amounts for senior citizen homeowners and non-senior citizen homeowners <br />was $40 ($239 vs $199). The only other instance that I am aware of in which <br />there would be a difference in the treatment of senior versus non-senior <br />citizens for property tax purposes would be in the case of property eligible <br />for preferrential assessment rates as provided in Minnesota Statutes 1978, <br />Section 273.13, Subdivisions 17, 17a, 17b, and 17c*. Please refer to the <br />law for the specific details, but in general these sections provide that <br />certain property used for housing the elderly or low and moderate income <br />families shall be assessed at 20% of assessor's market value. In comparison,. <br />apartment buildings generally are assessed at 40% of market value. Of course <br />this does not really benefit the other property owners within the city or <br />taxing district since the total amount of property taxes levied is not affected. <br />It merely means that the property taxes which are not paid by this property <br />because of its lower assessment rate will instead be paid by all other property <br />owners in the taxing district, some of whom are homestead owners; and, while <br />the increased amount of property taxes paid by these taxpayers will to some <br />degree result in increased amounts of state paid credits (regular homestead <br />credit and property tax refunds), the fact that some of the property owners <br />are already receiving their maximum allowable amounts of these credits means <br />that for some there would be no increase in'credits, only an increase in tax. <br /> <br />I will just briefly touch on the other major taxes, the income tax and sales <br />tax. For the income tax, the basic difference is the additional personal <br />credit provided for senior citizens (credit is applied against income tax <br />liability and is not refunded if individual has no liability or a liability <br />of less than the credit amount). The amount of the additional credit allowed <br />senior citizeh filers is $55 for tax year 1979, returns to be filed in 1980. <br />The sales tax has no special exemption for senior citizens except in that food, <br />clothing and drugs are exempt from the sales tax for everyone. To the extent, <br />that seniors buy more of the exempt items proportionately than other people, <br />they receive more of a benefit'(and pay less into the state treasury). <br /> <br />* New subdivision enacted by Laws of Minnesota 1979, Chapter 303, Article II, <br /> Section 16. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.