My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/27/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 08/27/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:38:51 PM
Creation date
8/11/2004 2:51:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/27/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minnesota <br /> Environmental Quality <br />,100 Capitol Square Building <br />550 Cedar Street <br />St. Paul, MinnesOta 55101 <br />Phone (612)296-2686 <br /> <br />August 2, 1979 <br /> <br />Board <br /> <br />Mr. Lloyd Schnelle, City Administrator <br />City of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Blvd. N.W. <br />Anoka, Minnesota 55303 <br /> <br />Re: Alpaca Estates Rezon]ng Requests <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Schnelle: <br /> <br /> As requested by you in our July 30 telephone conversation I am writing to <br />specifically address the proposed Alpaca Estates rezoning requests. However, <br />since the EQB has no real zoning authority I can Only comment on the proposed <br />zoning as it may affect the general use guidelineS for the Rural Open Space <br />District and the Critical Area in general. The most pertinent guidelines are: <br /> <br /> "'"' 1. Rural Open Space District.. The lands and waters within this district <br /> shall be used and developed to prese~rVe their.open, scenic and natural <br /> characteristics and ecological and economic .functions. 'Presently <br /> undeveloped islands shall be maintained in their existing natural <br /> state. The transportation function of the river shall be ma. intained <br /> and preserved. : <br /> <br /> 2. The Mississippi River Corridor §hall be managed in accordance. with <br /> the Metropolitan Council's Development Guide Chapter, Critical Areas <br /> Act of 1973, and the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act of 1973, <br /> and other-applicable state laws, and federal laws. <br /> <br /> It is also difficult for t~e EQB staff to c~mment on a zoning change since <br />the primary purpose of the Critical Area's Planning Process is for local govern- <br />ment to reassess their existing plans and regulations against the. designation <br />order. I would assume that your plan_ner is a~alyzing existing zoning and is <br />recommending appropriate modifica.tions. Since your planner 'is more familiar · <br />with the community and Other ~factors influencing.local~ zoning, I would recom- <br />mend you solicit his comments and review the 'proposed zon~hg amendments against <br />your.draft Critical Area Plan. <br /> <br /> I have:'reviewed the zoning amendment requests against'the Critical Area" <br />Planning Standards and Guidelines and the Interim Development Regulations'. I <br />have several Comments,. but these must be tempered by the fact that several of <br /> <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.