My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/13/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 11/13/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:40:12 PM
Creation date
8/13/2004 8:02:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/13/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROPOSED MINNESOTA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVES ACT <br /> <br />A Metropolitan Council Staff Paper <br /> <br />H.F. 1612 <br />Authors: <br /> <br />S.F. 1597 <br />Authors: <br /> <br />Schreiber, Levi, Vanasek, Sviggum, McEachern <br /> <br />Sikorski, Purfeerst <br /> <br />I NTRODUCTI ON <br /> <br />The companion bills H.F. 1612 and S.F. 1597, Minnesota Agricultural Preserves <br />Act, were introduced in the Minnesota House and Senate during the 1979 legis- <br />lative session and could be considered during the 1980 session. <br /> <br />The bills are based on recommendations from the Rural Area Task Force to the <br />Metropolitan Council in December 1978. Council members will hold public meetings <br />in their districts during November 1979 to obtain input from farmers and other <br />citizens and to encourage support for agricultural preserves. <br /> <br />The bills propose that a package of benefits be offered to enable farmers near <br />urban areas who want to continue farming to do so on an equal footing with far- <br />mers not affected by urban pressures. The intent is to allow farmers to make <br />long-term agricultural investments with the assurance that their land would <br />continue in farm use. <br /> <br />Farmland in agricultural preserves would be taxed according .to its agricultural <br />capability rather than market value,-and mill rates would be reduced to a <br />level comparable to outstate agricultural areas. Special assessments for urban <br />sewer and water systems would be prohibited. Limits would be placed on local <br />and state regulations that interfere with normal farm practices. <br /> <br />State agencies would be directed to presume in favor of agricultural preserves. <br />Eminent domain'actions would be required to show that no reasonable alternative <br />to the proposed land taking exists. The agricultural preserve designation <br />would run with the land with no limitation on ownePship. Land could be bought <br />and sold as farmland with no penalities. <br /> <br />To be eligible for designation as an agricultural preserve, Metropolitan Area <br />farmland would have to be planned and zoned for long-term agriculture. To <br />obtain the designation, any owner of 40 acres or more of such farmland would <br />sign an agreement establishing an agricultural preserve for the land. <br /> <br />A summary of provisions in each section of the bills follows. A copy of the <br />entire bill(s) is provided in the Appendix. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS <br /> <br />SECTION 1. (Statement of Policy and Purpose) <br /> <br />Establishes state policy for preserving farmland. See text. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.