My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/26/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 11/26/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:46:20 PM
Creation date
8/13/2004 10:03:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/26/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.,I nCllllll'll t for <br />.'age 3 <br />Dctobc, r ll, 1979 <br /> <br />experience data. We had requested that employee and dependent rates reflect relative <br />experience. The decrease in the Low Plan rate and the negotiated reduction in the <br />deductible from $500 to $300 is a result of the favorable claim experience. <br /> <br />GENERAL CONCERNS RELATED TO THE COUNTY'S PURCIIASE OF MEDICAL BENEFIT PLANS <br /> <br />The County, as with most political subdivisions in Minnesota, works under substantial <br />handicaps with respect to purchasing services of insurance companies, service organi- <br />zations, or third party administrators and HMOs. The state law which insists on <br />competitive bidding each four years or when a 50% rate increase is received has <br />encouraged many major commercial insurers to ignore opportunities to bid on govern- <br />mental business. In addition, legislation would be required should the County want <br />to establish any form of self-insurance to improve cash flow in the medical area. <br />At present, the County has extremely high penetration of HMOs into its employee group <br />which limits its funding options. Despite the general potential for cost control <br />of the HMOs, they are either community rating the County; loading on top of standard <br />community rates; or experience rating the County and using questionable back up <br />data. The relative immaturity and rapid growth of the HMOs has not yet allowed <br />for sophisticated management information systems---thus-even in the experience <br />rating situations, data is not complete enough to justify the rate increases. <br /> <br />The County shall review the overall funding options each year to determine if any <br />improvements can be made, but will be limited in its ability to make any changes <br />given current state laws. <br /> <br />PROBLEMS WITH CURRENT PROVIDERS <br /> <br />PHP <br />The problems with PHP relate to the matter of data, rate calculation,-communications, <br />and lack of flexibility. <br /> <br />1. DATA PROBLEMS <br />The rate increase proposed for January l, 1980 was based on an annualized level <br />of incurred claims. By this we mean that PHP took the claims for the first <br />seven months of 1979 and projected them through 1979. This technique is not <br />consistent with the more generally accepted actuarial/underwriting practice of <br />utilizing the most recent actual 12 months of paid claims experience as a basis <br />for calculation. Further, the County has no means of verification of this data. <br />A total claims number is presented but there is no back up data to be used for <br />audit purposes. In short, we are being asked to accept the claim figure upon <br />which rates are based, with a great deal of faith. <br /> <br />During 1978 and again in 1979, PHP reacted to short-term trends with a certain <br />degree of panic which later proved to be unfounded. In 1978, PHP alleged county employ- <br />ee over utilization of chemical dependency and alcoholism benefits; Their support- <br />ing data was not totally convincing based upon a short evaluation period and <br />the issue seemed to disappear without meaningful follow-up. In July of 1979, <br />PHP suggested that County employees utilized benefits much more than employees <br />from instrumentalities. This was not confirmed in the data provided--in fact <br />at the time of this writing the County has not received a requested breakdown <br />of experience data between the County and the instrumentalities. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.