Laserfiche WebLink
5. POLICY BOARD BUSINESS <br /> <br />5.01: Consider Fact Sheet for Rogers Lake <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report, noting that in 2015 and again in 2016, the City <br />received a request from a resident who owns a riparian lot on Rogers Lake to implement <br />restrictions on both motorized watercraft and hunting on Rogers Lake. That resident believes <br />motorized boats create a noise nuisance and boat propellers remove lake vegetation. In addition, <br />the resident is concerned about noise and safety related to hunting on or around the lake. <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson stated staff met with representatives of Nowthen and Oak Grove that <br />share jurisdiction over Rogers Lake to review the solution proposed by the resident and arrived <br />at a consensus that a better approach may be to provide better education on regulations that <br />already exist rather than creating new regulations that would be difficult to enforce. He <br />explained it is unlikely Nowthen and Oak Grove would support an ordinance restricting <br />motorized watercraft or hunting limits beyond State Statute. He noted there is no public access <br />on this Lake to allow any jurisdiction to enforce limitations on watercraft. <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson described Rogers Lake as being relatively shallow with a significant <br />amount of aquatic vegetation, making it closely related to a wetland. It was designated by the <br />MPCA as impaired due to excess nutrients but the DNR is now successfully enforcing vegetation <br />removal limits, which has resulted in significantly improved water quality and may likely resolve <br />the primary concern. <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson stated staff does not recommend changing the hunting regulation on <br />Rogers Lake as appropriate tools are in place to address that concern. It was noted staff had <br />discussed an educational alternative and the resident is supportive of that approach. <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson reviewed the City Council’s consideration and indicated it was not <br />supportive of creating additional regulations that would be challenging to enforce. Rather, the <br />City Council directed staff to develop educational information for the lakeshore property owners <br />that includes review of existing rules/regulations for Rogers Lake. <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson presented the Fact Sheet drafted by staff that would be considered by the <br />three municipalities that have jurisdiction over Rogers Lake. <br /> <br />Board Member Valentine asked if the communities have provided a guide for what they would <br />like to see occur on this lake. <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson stated that the cities were in agreement with not creating new standards <br />or regulations, and therefore would like to continue allowing what is currently allowed under <br />those regulations. He stated that once they receive clarification from the DNR they will be more <br />aware of what types of activities are allowed. <br /> <br />Board Member Valentine stated that once the classification of the lake is known that should <br />provide more guidance on what actions could be taken to improve the aquatic plant situation. <br /> <br /> <br />Environmental Policy Board / October 17, 2016 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />