Laserfiche WebLink
would not need to be fully developed in order to move forward on this item but could simply be a <br />part of this ordinance review. <br />Board Member Valentine commented that if the City can handle the additional staff time, he would <br />support incentive programs. <br />City Planner Anderson acknowledged that an incentive program would take more overhead in <br />terms of staff time, likely from himself and other departments as well. He agreed that this would <br />be more a proactive program. <br />Board Member Valentine stated that people tend to be more encouraged by proactive incentives <br />rather than being forced to do something. <br />Board Member Trossen asked if this would be limited to commercial properties. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that this would not need to be solely for commercial properties, but <br />would be limited to those connected to the City's water system. He stated that this attempt was to <br />gauge whether or not the Board would be interested and explained that if there was interest he <br />would then begin to gather information on various incentive programs used (program details, <br />funding, and who is using the program). He stated that he would also run the idea of the incentive <br />program past the Public Works Committee as well. <br />City Planner Anderson confirmed the consensus of the Board to direct staff to research further <br />details on an incentive program and prepare a draft ordinance amendment for the Board to review <br />at the January meeting. <br />Board Member Trossen asked if additional language could be added that would require an <br />additional sensor/equipment that would assist in conservation. <br />City Planner Anderson provided additional details on some of the sensors available. <br />Chairperson Stodola commented that the item seems like overkill and that it would be expensive. <br />City Planner Anderson explained that in a situation in the past a contractor had stated that the <br />additional sensor was maybe a couple hundred dollars extra when the system is being newly <br />installed. He noted that it would be more expensive to retrofit an existing system. <br />Board Member Covart stated that she has an additional sensor with her irrigation system at her <br />home and provided additional details. She noted that it was not much more expensive to get the <br />additional sensor. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that he would be glad to gather more information on the technology <br />and the costs to bring back to the Board at a future meeting. He noted that perhaps he would be <br />able to find someone in the irrigation field that could attend a meeting to provide additional details <br />to the Board. <br />6. BOARD / STAFF INPUT <br />Environmental Policy Board / December 19, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />