Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session 7. 5. <br />Meeting Date: 11/07/2016 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Ordinance #16-10 Approving a Zoning Amendment Related to Brookfield 8th Addition (Project #16-78); <br />Case of Brookfield Land, LLC. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider adoption of Ordinance #16-10 to approve a Zoning Amendment for a <br />portion of land in the proposed Brookfield 8th Addition from R-1 Residential (Rural Developing) to R-1 Residential <br />(MUSA). Brookfield Land LLC (the "Applicant") has proposed a development consisting of twenty-five (25) single <br />family residential lots to be serviced by municipal sanitary sewer and water on Outlot A, Brookfield 2nd Addition <br />and PID #09-32-25-44-0017 (together, the "Subject Property"). On October 25, 2016, the City Council approved a <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment (and directed Staff to forward the CPA to the Metropolitan Council for <br />consideration) and the Preliminary Plat for Brookfield 8th Addition as well as introduced Ordinance #16-10 to <br />rezone a portion of the Subject Property to R-1 Residential (MUSA). <br />Note: only two (2) proposed lots of the 25 proposed lots are subject to the Zoning Amendment. A majority of the <br />Subject Property is already guided appropriately for the proposed development. <br />Notification: <br />Staff attempted to notify all Property Owners within a 700 foot radius of the Subject Property of the Public Hearing <br />via Standard US Mail. The Public Hearing was also published in the City's official newsletter, the Anoka County <br />Union Herald. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The Applicant has proposed a zoning amendment for a portion of the property from R-1 Residential (Rural <br />Developing) to R-1 Residential (MUSA). The proposed zoning designation is in keeping with the change in land <br />use from Rural Developing to Low Density Residential. The City's Zoning Code/Map is the implementation tool of <br />the Comprehensive Plan, and the two must be consistent. Staff is supportive of the proposed zoning amendment as <br />all the other lots on the Subject Property will be served with municipal utilities. <br />The Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on October 6, 2016, and there were no written or verbal <br />comments received. The City Council introduced Ordinance #16-10 on October 25, 2016 and the ordinance is now <br />eligible for adoption. <br />Alternatives <br />Alternative 1: Adopt Ordinance #16-10 rezoning a portion of the Subject Property from R-1 Residential (Rural <br />Developing) to R-1 Residential (MUSA). This rezoning would impact two (2) of the proposed lots, allowing them <br />to also be served by municipal sanitary sewer and water. This would be consistent with all of the other lots within <br />the Brookfield subdivision. Staff supports this alternative. <br />Alternative 2: Do not adopt Ordinance #16-10. The proposed rezoning to include two (2) lots in the MUSA district <br />is consistent with the rest of the Brookfield subdivision. Furthermore, the two (2) lots are separated from adjacent, <br />larger residential lots by large a large wetland complex; thus, creating a natural buffer between the two residential <br />