My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Anoka Co Thoroughfare Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
Anoka Co Thoroughfare Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2025 3:33:25 PM
Creation date
8/24/2004 10:53:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
township in which they are located. The following characteristics of <br />each routes segment are given: 1) route function; 2) approximate length <br />in miles; 3) the estimated 1990 traffic volume classification; and, <br />4) the route planning number. The estimated 1990 traffic volume clas- <br />sifications are as follows: <br /> <br />A. Over 12,000 vehicles per day <br />B. 4,000 - 12,000 vehicles per day <br />C. 1,000 - 4,000 vehicles per day <br />D. Under 1,000 vehicles per day <br /> <br />A four-lane road facility is recommended for volume classifications <br />A and B. <br /> <br />Obviously, the entire plan cannot be implemented at one time. Rather <br />it is intended to be implemented incrementally as specific elements <br />are built. It is extremely important to follow through on the imple- <br />mentation of all system levels when a new plan element is completed. <br />If, for instance, a new minor arterial is developed in conformance with <br />the plan, it is also essential to develop divertors and to utilize <br />other traffic engineering measures to force the collector and/or local <br />function of the facility which the new arterial replaces. Figures 1S <br />and 16 illustrate this concept. <br /> <br />The disposition of all County roads has been made in the Thoroughfare <br />Plan. Table 4 gives a summary of the functional classification of <br />existing and recommended County roads. <br /> <br />It is recommended that 7.8 miles of the existing County road system <br />attain the function of principal arterial and come under the jurisdiction <br />of the State. 205.7 miles of the present County system and an additional <br />43.1 miles of new location routes should function as minor arterial <br />routes. These routes should come under the jurisdiction of the County <br />and should comprise the CSAH system..]69.7 miles of the existing County <br />road system and an additional ll.0miles of new location routes should <br />function as collector routes and should be under the jurisdictions of <br />the County and municipalities. 21.5 miles of the present County road <br />system should function as local roads and should be under the juris- <br />diction of the municipalities and townships. <br /> <br />Recommended Access Control Policies <br /> <br />Hxperience indicates that controlled access arterials are economical in <br />the long run. The arterial without access control begins to lose capa- <br />city as soon as roadside interference begins, whereas the controlled <br />access arterial consistently retains its ability to carry traffic. The <br />non-controlled access arterial soon becomes obsolete, and the result <br />is the costly necessity of relocating and constructing a new arterial. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />64 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.