My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
12/11/78
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1970's
>
1978
>
12/11/78
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2025 4:06:52 PM
Creation date
8/26/2004 8:07:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning & Zoning Commission
Document Date
12/11/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P &Z-l- <br />11/6/78 <br /> <br /> Planning & Zoning <br /> City of Ramsey <br />(iounty of Anoka <br />State of Minnesota <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Ramsey City Planning & Zoning Commission was held <br />on November 6, 1978 at Ramsey City Municipal Center, 15153 Nowthen Blvd N.W. <br />Meeting was called to order by Chairman Ken Peterson ~at 7:35 p.m. with the <br />following in attendance:. <br /> <br />Kenneth Peterson <br />A1Sorteberg <br /> <br />Ron West <br />Kathy Schneider <br /> <br />Also Present: <br />Lloyd Schnelle, Cit.y Admin. <br /> <br />Motion by Al' Sorteberg, seconded by Ron West to table approval of the minutes <br />for October 2, 1978 and October 16, 1978 due to insufficient number'of members <br />present. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />Item 1. Case of Arthur St. Hilaire - Conditional Use Permit. <br />Mr. St. Hilaire was present to explain that he 'is considering purchasing the <br />property.at 14544 Nowthen B!vd N..W. if he can operate a auto ~epair business <br />at that location. He explained that he usually purchases wrecked autos to re- <br />pair and sell, and that he does have an outlet for the sales other than the <br />property if necessary. Chairman, Ken Peterson explained that he would have <br />to apply for a co~nditional use permit and a.public hearing would have to be held. <br />Mr. St. Hilaire was advised that he would be asked to specifically describe his <br />intentions for the property, and that if considered desireable, definite con- <br />ditions would be attached as part of.the permit. Mr. St. Hilaire was advised to <br />ask the Administrator for the necessary application if he wished to proceed. <br /> <br />Item 2. Case of Arthur Anderson - Subdivision Request. <br />Mr. Anderson along with Keith Graham were present with a request to subdivide a <br />3+ acre parcel into three t acre parcels in order to obtain permits to construct <br />houses for himself and two other members of his family. <br /> <br />Ron West stated that he was opposed to this subdivision since it is located in <br />the rural area and on Bison Street which is not considered an upgraded City <br />Street. Ken Peteron stated that he felt it was too drastic a variance request, <br />and explained the problem with the school bus and Bison Street. A1Sorteberg <br />explained that we do have to follow the existing ordinance, considering the <br />status of the street. Ken Peterson explained that if Mr. Anderson wished <br />to apply for one oermit, he should keep in mind that a subdivision could possibly <br />be allowed sometime in the future, so placement of a house should be carefully <br />considered. <br /> <br />Motion by A1 Sorteberg, seconded by Ron West to recommend to the City Council <br />to deny the request by Mr. Arthur Anderson to subdivide a 3.02 acre parcel <br />located on Bison Street in the rural area into 3 one.acr~ lots due to the <br />condition of Bison Street and location of parcel in rural area. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />Item.3. Case of Fred Armstrong Rezoning request. <br />Mr. Schnelle provided bafkground on this matter and the reason it had been re- <br />ferred back to P & Z. <br />Motion by A1 Sorteberg, seconded by Ron West to amend motion of 9/11/1978 by <br />addition of findings of fact #5 and #6 as follows: <br />5.) Would allow better control of land use. ~ <br />6.) Without specific reason defining how line was determined, Commission does <br /> not feel it would adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan to square off <br /> this corner to even the boundary line. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.