Laserfiche WebLink
Case #1 <br /> BUSINESS PARK MONUMENT SIGNAGE <br />By: Scan Sullivan, Economic Development / TIF Specialist <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Staff was directed to research sign types and possible vendors for signs for the City's industrial Parks and other <br />prominent locations at City entrance points. Staff has contacted Elk River Brick and Stone, T J Associates, <br />Granite Signs and an individual affiliated with Bake Star. The purpose of this discussion is find desirable sign <br />types and to locate vendors that would be able to quote and construct these signs. Once the sign types have <br />been defined, specific locations and timing will be worked out at a later date. It is anticipated that the funds for <br />these signs will be utilized from corresponding TIF Districts and/or from the EDA budget. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />During the course of the EDA meeting Staff will hand out a number of pictures relating to 43 specific sign <br />types. Each EDA member should pick out 3 or 4 sign types and document them on the sheet to be provided at <br />the meeting. By meetings end, the group should reach a general consensus on which 4 or 5 sign types to <br />research further. At the time of the meeting only Elk River Brick and Stone was able to put together some <br />quotes for the signage but that is not a determining factor at this point. The challenge to the EDA is to identify <br />what types of signs are appropriate and to direct staff to get more details regarding the signs including costs and <br />vendors. The recommendation on which sign types to pursue should come at this meeting as to keep the <br />process moving forward. <br /> <br />Redevelopment Signs: <br /> <br />During the August EDA meeting, the EDA discussed the possibility of erecting a sign stating that this property <br />is part of a redevelopment project. Staff inquired several cities (Anoka, Coon Rapids, Roseville, Becker, and <br />Elk River) and was not successful in finding a City that erects such redevelopment signs. However, the City <br />currently erects 8x4 white Land Use Signs when a resident requests a land use change (i.e. conditional use <br />permit, variance, etc.) or when a property goes through a subdivision or site plan application. The signs cost <br />approximately $120.00 and they require two staff people to install. Furthermore, the signs continually tip over <br />and can be an obstruction on a property. Instead of installing a huge redevelopment sign, staff would suggest <br />purchasing a few real estate signs and place them on a property upon City purchase. The sign could state <br />something to the effect that the City purchased the property for redevelopment purposes and is promoting high <br />quality development. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Based on discussion <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />City Administrator, Jim Norman <br />Associate Planner, Megan Wald <br /> <br />EDA: 09.8.04 <br /> <br /> <br />