Laserfiche WebLink
General Contract -79-132 <br /> <br />Adam Construction <br />15515 University Avenue NE <br />Anoka <br /> <br />79-133 <br /> <br />Excavation 79-130 <br /> <br />Jim Miller Construction <br />Box 1228 <br />St. Cloud <br />Kober Excavating <br />18575 Simonet Drive <br />Elk River <br /> <br />Motion carried. .Voting yes: Acting Mayor Reimann, Councilmen Mickelson <br />and Sorteberg. Voting no: None. <br /> <br />MEETING NOTICE FACILITY PLANNING STUDY <br /> <br />Engineer Dick Sha indicated that he will be at'the meeting representing <br />Metro Waste Control. The entime 201 planning process is finished through <br />federal grant and it is important that elected officials know what is going on. <br /> <br />Councilman Mickelson asked Mr. Sha how close they are to approving the <br />sewer designations. <br /> <br />Engineer Sha said the hearing on all of this is scheduled in March of 1980 <br />and all of_the plans are tied together. The Anoka portion, they are trying <br />to fund for'1980, remainder by 1984. If the Anoka plant stays in operation <br />as it is, or'expanded to the limits of the Bite, it look~slike even expanding <br />to the site, that part of the wastefmomthis area will have to go down <br />through Champlin/Brookiyn Park. The MWWC owns ~the Anoka plant-not Anoka. <br />Regarding the question of sewer capacity at Anoka, what level of theatment <br />they had, rCA decreed that secondary treatment is all they have to-be planned <br />for? <br /> <br />'RECEIVING'AND.ACCEPTING'BIDSFOR'STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT <br /> <br />Engineer Sha noted Engineer Raatikka's letter dated June 25, .979 <br />regarding the bids received for'th~ foildwi~g projects: 79-3, 79-4 and 79-5. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Mickelson and seconded by Councilman Sorteberg to Adopt <br />Resolution No. 79-49 Accepting the Bid of NDH IncorPorated for a total <br />base bid of $178,914.00. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Acting Mayor Reimann, Councilmen Mickelson <br />and Sorteberg. Voting no: None. <br /> <br />Discussion was held on the costs and the fact that~the City has no resources <br />for doing the restoration. <br /> <br />VARIOLITE'STREET'IMPROVEMENT'PROJECT.'No.'79-2 <br /> <br />A petition from the property owners was presented requesting an Environmental <br />Impact Statement. <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the City legally has no obligation to respond <br />to this petition but has taken it upon'themselves to save the berm. Further, <br />that the City would not'want to commit itself to doing environmental impact <br />statements each time something is done, there are some nice trees involved in <br /> <br />Regular Counctl Meeting <br /> June 25,1979 <br /> <br /> <br />