Laserfiche WebLink
The Commission indicated that they are concerned about the future use of <br />the building if it should be sold in the future to another company. <br /> <br />Ron West stated that the main concern is that the footings and foundation be <br />put in so that the building will not sag. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson suggested waiving the concrete floor requirement and <br />having frost footings and foundation installed. <br /> <br />Art Dunn expressed concern that the Commission would be swaying from its <br />original conviction that they would require Type IV n - as indicated <br />in the U.B.C. <br /> <br />Ben Deemer said he definitely wants to see footings and foundation. <br /> <br />The exterior of the building.was discussed. <br /> <br />Art Dunn said it should be something-other~than just solid Steel, something~ <br />should be used to break up the length of the building. <br /> <br />John Hubbard stated that he felt the archite~t coUld.have used some <br />imagination to break up one continuous steel building. <br /> <br />Mr. Jerich said he will bring'in something showing the building dressed <br />up and to break up the monotonous appearance of the metal. <br /> <br />Motion by We~t, seconded by Peterson to recommend to the City Council <br />that Midwestern Underground show a suitable exterior appearance to meet <br />the site plan review requirements, that frost footings and foundation be <br />installed, that the concrete floor be waived, that asphalt surfacing of <br />the parking area be waived and Class V installed instead. Further, <br />that Items 2, 3 and 4 of the City Engineer's letter be met and that Item <br />No. 6 regarding the right of way for Azurite Street will have to be resolved. <br />That. a development contract be prepared and stipulation be included in the <br />contract that this will be used for sto~age only and that there will be no repairs <br />or other activities conducted in this new structure; further, that it is <br />contingent on a revised site plan being submitted showing the changes. <br /> <br />Motion carried. 6 AYes <br /> <br />Be~ Deemer indicated that if this were a brand new proposal versus-an addition <br />to an existing business, he would definitely insist on the letter of the code <br />bei.ng followed as it is spelled out in the site plan review approval. ' <br /> <br />MINING ORDINANCE <br /> <br />Chariman Peterson noted that the Commission is concerned that controls be <br />established to regulate mining operations and some plan for restoring land <br />to decent conditions and insuring that some good top soil will be retained <br />in certain areas etc., and therefore they feel that the City should adopt a <br />mining ordinance. <br /> <br />Regular' Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting <br /> 1/7/ 80 Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />