Laserfiche WebLink
P&Z-2- <br />3/18/8o <br /> <br /> d. Comply with adding verticle curves where different street <br /> gradients meet (Article 170.03!C4). <br /> e. The entire portion of Llama Street should be constructed with the <br /> development of the plat with the City proceeding with Chapter 429 <br /> of the State Statutes to acheive this. <br /> f. A bike lane on the river side of the street should be established <br /> by adding an additional 4 foot shoulder to the river side of the <br /> suburban street, and then using two feet of the street plus the 4 <br /> foot shoulder create a 6 foot bike lane marked by signing:and/or <br /> stripping. <br /> 5. Comply with DNR permit for stormwater runoff into the Mississippi. <br /> 6. Comply with obtaining percolation rates for design of the drain- <br /> fields, plus have the developmental contract reflect that Lots <br /> 7-9 Block 8 must meet the Class I land requirements for on-site <br /> sewage disposal systems before final plat approval. <br /> 7. Comply with meeting Park requirement in form of a cash payment. <br /> , Also note that the Con~nercial Street has not yet been named. <br />This recommendation is based on the plat as presented at the March 18, 1980 <br />meeting and in the event there is any revision of lot size/ road layout, 'this- <br />p]~t must be resubmitted for reapproval by the P & Z Commission. <br />Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />~!l-lRbglN & (]tAPMAN STATEMENT <br /> <br />Conm~ission reviewed the recent billihg from Wehrman & Chapman and ~btion by <br />Ben Deemer, seconded by Gerry Zimmennan to recommend that the City Council <br />withhold payment of $1,083.00 or 10% of total bill until completion of plan. <br />Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />Revision of City Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br />Comnission members reviewed the plan that was presented at an earlier meeting <br />and several minor discepancieswere discussed. These changes/questions will <br />be presented to Mr. Marston by Chairman Peterson. <br /> <br />COMPI~ItENSIVE PLAN DEADLINE <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson pointed out that we are behind on the proposed time <br />schedule for the plan, but that Mr. Marston and he have discussed completion <br />by April with Public Hearings/ Council approval before June 1980. Mr. Marston <br />hopes to present the plan. to the Ymtro Council in Jtme 1980. There will be <br />a workshop meeting on April 1, 1980 to complete the Public Facilities Section. <br />This meeting will be in lieu of the April-15th workshop. <br /> <br />MEADOWBROOK ESTATES <br /> <br />Mr. Sd~nelle explained that the Park dedication part of this plat has not <br />been resolved as yet. Commission members reviewed their recommendation from <br />February 4th and feel it is still valid. Furthermore it was the consensus of <br />the Commission that the City should not acquire land that they will not be <br />able to use, and that a scenic easement along one side with park land on the <br />other would be a solution. Chairman Peterson stated that if the City and <br />Park Commission definitely want land on both sides, then the Commission would <br />concur, however, the P & Z Commission has not seen any plan showing how this <br />acquisition will take place in areas already developed or how the presently <br />useless land (slopes ect.) can be developed for use. It is the consensus <br />of the Commission that a trail system along the brook could be an assest, but <br />feel the P & ]~ should present a specific plan showing how this can be accomplished. <br /> <br /> P ~ Z WORKSHOP- Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />