Laserfiche WebLink
Alternatives: <br />Alternative #1 — Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #17-02-044 at this time, to postpone the public hearing for <br />Improvement Project #17-00, Sunwood Drive Reconstruction, until February 28, 2017, and to revise the Feasibility <br />Report by incorporating the attached assessment map and roll. <br />Alternative #2 — Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #17-02-044 at this time, to postpone the public hearing for <br />Improvement Project #17-00, Sunwood Drive Reconstruction, until February 28, 2017, and to revise the Feasibility <br />Report as follows, <br />Alternative #3 — Motion to adopt Resolution #17-02-044 accepting the Feasibility Report and ordering Plans and <br />Specifications for Improvement Project #17-00, Sunwood Drive Reconstruction. <br />Funding Source: <br />City staff prepared the Feasibility Report in-house as part of staff's normal duties. <br />The engineer's opinion of probable costs for the proposed improvements on Sunwood Drive as outlined in the <br />Feasibility Report is $607,000. Estimated costs include 23% indirect costs for administrative, engineering, finance <br />and legal costs. A summary of the engineer's opinion of probable costs is included in Appendix B of the Feasibility <br />Report. <br />NTI completed a Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Review at a cost of $4,400 which is included in <br />Appendix Dof the Feasibility Report. WSB and Associates, Inc. completed Pavement Evaluations and <br />Recommendations at a not -to -exceed cost of $2,687.50 which is also included inAppendix D, <br />Assessable industrial parcels are preliminarily proposed to be assessed for 25 percent of eligible project costs <br />totaling $151,750. The City will pay the remaining 75% of project costs including $447,950 from the 5 year Street <br />Reconstruction and Overlay Program bond funds, and $7,300 from stormwater utility funds. The preliminary <br />Assessment Map and Roll included in Appendix C of the Feasibility Report were preliminarily approved by <br />Council on January 24th. Attached are a revised assessment map and revised assessment roll that reflect staff <br />proposed adjustments to the preliminary assessments for this project. If Council accepts the adjustments proposed <br />by staff, the assessment map and roll included in the attached Feasibility Report will be replaced with the revised <br />map and roll attached. Alternatively, Council may direct staff to make other adjustments to the assessment roll, in <br />which case such revisions would be incorporated into the Feasibility Report before the Public Hearing. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, depending on whether Council directs any modifications to the Feasibility <br />Report. Staff does not support Alternative #3 since the property owners staff met with were informed Staff's <br />recommendation would be to postpone the hearing until February 28, 2017. <br />It is the recommendation of City staff that City Project No. 17-00 is feasible, necessary, and cost-effective from an <br />engineering standpoint, and that this project would best be constructed as a stand-alone project as proposed in the <br />Feasibility Report. <br />The following Staff recommendations related to the proposed project are presented for Council consideration and <br />concurrence: <br />1. Staff recommends reconstructing the segment of Sunwood Drive between Ramsey Boulevard/CSAH 56 and <br />Bunker Lake Boulevard /CSAH 116 as proposed in 2017 thereby meeting current State Aid design standards <br />and allowing all project costs to be eligible for the use of special assessments per the City's Special <br />Assessments Policy. <br />2. Staff recommends ordering a benefit appraisal consultation report to ensure the preliminary assessments as <br />