Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed concept appears generally in line with the Comprehensive Plan, which guides this area for a mix of <br />medium density residential (3-7 units per acre) and a small portion of high density residential (7-15 units per acre). <br />However, the boundaries of the Land Use Districts do not match exactly that of the proposed development concept. <br />The Comprehensive Plan will need to be adjusted slightly to reflect the proposal. <br />Planned Unit Development <br />The site is comprised of a mix of R-2 Residential and R-3 Residential to match the Comprehensive Plan addressed <br />above. While a majority of the proposal appears to meet minimum zoning standards, there areas that may deviate <br />slightly from minimums. In addition, a significant amount of open space, of value to the project, may impact net <br />density. Finally, the site is being planned as a whole, and phased over time. Due to these layers of review, a Planned <br />Unit Development may be an appropriate tool to employ at this time. <br />Mandatory Environmental Review <br />Due to the number of units, which is a mix of attached and unattached units, State Rules require this project to <br />completed an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. A brief synopsis of this process is attached to this case. <br />Park Dedication and Trail Fees <br />A total of 334 residential units (estimated), of single family homes + townhomes are proposed to be platted in <br />phases over the next several years. Park Dedication (cash contribution) and Trail Fees would typically be calculated <br />per the existing fee schedule at the time of development of each phase. Preliminary discussions with the Developer <br />indicate they may be requesting some Park Dedication credit for private open space within the proposed plat. Staff <br />has explained the longstanding policy of not requiring or encouraging public 'pocket parks', but rather planning for, <br />and providing Park Dedication and Trail Fee credit for building trail connections within the community, and <br />investing in larger, quality neighborhood and community parks. The Developer may still include private open space <br />and park -like amenities within the subdivision; however the Park and Recreation Commission is likely to <br />recommend either that Park Dedication (and Trail Fees) be satisfied in cash, or specified improvements that have <br />accessible, recreational value to the community outside of the interior of the proposed subdivision. Examples of <br />specified, Park Dedication eligible improvements include: <br />• Pedestrian underpass below Alpine Drive connecting Lake Itasca Community Park with the proposed plat <br />and existing trail(s) Staff is now evaluating a roundabout concept on Alpine Drive. <br />• Segments of the proposed greenway trail between Lake Itasca Park and The COR (within or adjacent to the <br />proposed plat) <br />• Improvements to Lake Itasca Park, E.g. boardwalk or pier connection to the lake, canoe/kayak station, <br />parking areas, or park development plans <br />• Trailside improvements to the trail alongside Puma St., which is also an element of the Mississippi River <br />Trail (and U.S. Bikeway #45) <br />• Any number of potential enhancements/development to the park system in The COR, Eg. splash pad, site <br />development for the water -centric park, or the proposed Municipal Plaza (Happy Days location) —all of <br />which would be of benefit to new residents of Capstone's proposed project. <br />Arterial Infrastructure Cost Share <br />The development of the Capstone project, and the City's future business park, will result in the need to construct/ <br />upgrade arterial infrastructure located along Bunker Lake Boulevard/ Puma Street. Resolution of cost -share <br />agreements for the proposed arterial infrastructure improvements is outstanding and will be subject of negotiation. <br />On 12/13/2016, the Council authorized Bolton & Menk to update their arterial infrastructure study for this area, to <br />aid that discussion. That study should be completed, and back to the Council, by early March (potentially February). <br />Capstone is paying for 50% of that update study. <br />As outlined with the Council in the 12/13/2016 work session, the City should anticipate the need (or request) to <br />