My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/14/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 02/14/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:03:25 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 1:45:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/14/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
904
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Strommen asked for input from the EDA on the elements they consider to be successful, <br />similar to how the Planning Commission feels that an overall vision would be helpful. <br />Member Steffen noted that the case on the agenda tonight is a tough case and two opposing <br />points will be brought to the Council. He stated that he is unsure that the EDA wants to be in the <br />position of deciding where a business should be located. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that the key point is that everyone is being respectful of the other <br />party's decision. <br />Member Steffen stated that ultimately what is built is at the cost of the business that comes <br />forward with a quality product and is willing to pay the right price. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked what would happen if an entity were to come forward with a full <br />price sales offer that does not fit the vision and whether the City would have the ability to refuse. <br />Mayor Strommen replied that as the landowner the City does not have to sell. <br />City Attorney Langel confirmed that there is nothing to stop the City from making the decision <br />to not sell the land should they feel that would not be a good fit. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that statement highlights the different roles everyone plays. He <br />explained that while one body says yes and one body says no, the Council will need to look at <br />the request from their perspective and make the overall decision. <br />Member Skaff referenced the question of whether a master developer should be considered to <br />take the place of the City as the landowner. He stated that ultimately that question will need to <br />be addressed. <br />Mayor Strommen acknowledged the question continues to come up and the Council would like <br />to look at that option and what that would entail. <br />Commissioner VanScoy noted that although a piecemeal development may be of great quality, it <br />may not fit in the area which can cause issues down the line and implications on what could be <br />developed in the future. <br />Councilmember Shryock noted that an overall vision will help to ensure everyone is on the same <br />plan and working towards the same goal. She stated that the original plan for The COR was <br />focused on what the City wants and perhaps it should be more geared towards what the City has <br />and what they can work with to bring more success. <br />Mayor Strommen stated that the other issue is what the City will want not only today, but in five <br />or ten years. She agreed that she tends to shop online and avoids going to actual stores and the <br />City should anticipate those trends to avoid being irrelevant once built. <br />City Council Work Session / January 24, 2017 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.