Laserfiche WebLink
Review Summary <br />This case was reviewed by the EDA on 12/08/16 and 01/12/17. This case was reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission on 01/05/17 and 02/02/17. This case was reviewed by the Council on 01/24/17 and 02/14/17. All <br />parties are generally very supportive of the use/ proposed project. However, the site location has been the focal <br />point of conversations to -date. <br />The EDA is in general support of Stone Brook's proposed site location, Site #1 (5-1 vote on 01/12/17). The <br />Planning Commission is in general support of Stone Brook's proposed site location, Site #1 (5-1 vote on 02/02/17). <br />The Council is in general support of Stone Brook's proposed site location, Site #1 (7-0 vote on 02/14/17). <br />It appears all boards/ commissions have indicated support for a north -to -south road connection (Veteran's to <br />Sunwood). It appears there is not consensus on whether that road connection be a private drive or a public road. <br />Additionally, it appears there is general support for the attached master plan "B" which shows an east -to -west <br />internal connection through the proposed Stone Brook site. Please see attached Site #1 Feedback Log for details. <br />City Review process <br />This case is being addressed in several separate steps: <br />Step 1: Site Location/ Site Concept <br />The purpose of this case is to provide direction from a master developer perspective (site location, concept <br />project layout). <br />Step 2: Real Estate transaction (current case) <br />The purpose of this step will be to consider a formal purchase agreement (i.e. deal terms). <br />Step 3: Entitlement <br />The purpose of this step is to review Plat and Site Plan applications (i.e. site plan/ zoning/ land use <br />regulations). <br />Funding Source: <br />NA <br />Recommendation: <br />Provide preliminary feedback on the proposed concept site layout. <br />Action: <br />Provide preliminary feedback on the proposed concept site layout. Below are talking points suggested by staff. <br />(A) the north -to -south road connection. Should it be a public road, or private road? <br />(B) building orientation. Is there comfort in the proposed building orientation? <br />(C) east -to -west internal driveway connection. Can the Planning Commission confirm support for that <br />connection? <br />Proposed Concept Site Layout <br />Four Concept Master Site Layouts <br />Feedback Log <br />Purchase Agreement <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />