Laserfiche WebLink
only concern with the request was that he has not received a list of full engineering comments. <br />He hoped to receive this list prior to his application being considered by the City Council. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported the city engineer review memo would be <br />provided to the applicant prior to the City Council meeting. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked if the architecture of the building had changed since November. <br />Mr. Schultz reviewed the architectural plans for the self -storage building with the Commission <br />and noted only minor changes have been made to the plans. <br />Chairperson Bauer requested further information on how the site will be accessed. <br />Mr. Schultz reported the property would have full access from Ramsey Boulevard. <br />William Thomas, 14716 Limonite Street NW, questioned what would happen to Lot 2. <br />Mr. Schultz explained the plan was to have Lot 2 remain as is until it was purchased for <br />commercial development. He noted the ponding and some tree cleanup may occur, along with <br />some grading. <br />Mr. Thomas expressed concern with the noise and light pollution that would come from this lot <br />after trees were removed from the lot and questioned how the applicant would address this <br />concern. <br />City Planner Anderson commented he was unaware of the tree clearing the applicant was <br />proposing and this matter would have to be addressed with the applicant. <br />Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner VanScoy, to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, VanScoy, Brauer, <br />Nosan, and Surma. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 7:29 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Anderson understood the concerns being raised by the resident regarding the <br />trees. He indicated Lot 2 had a thick line of trees and he opposed these being removed. He <br />stated he could support the scrub trees being removed but recommended no significant trees be <br />removed until the site was ready for development. <br />Planning Commission/February 2, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />