Laserfiche WebLink
(5) City Council Feedback <br />01/24/2017 NOTES <br />o The City Council has indicated more information is needed before a final decision can be made (RE <br />site location). The Council was concerned about the ramifications this single project (about 1 <br />acre) would have on the development of the larger parcel/ block (about 5 acres). The <br />Council desires to know more about how the various development challenges associated with this <br />site will play out in various development scenarios (i.e. Stone Brook proposal vs. single developer <br />master planned site). <br />o Per Council direction, various professional development scenarios were drafted for consideration/ <br />discussion. The Council requested this case be reviewed one more time by the Planning <br />Commission before the Council made a final decision. The Council would like to receive feedback <br />from the Planning Commission on the attached four concepts. <br />o The Council was generally very supportive of the use/ proposed project. The Council would like to <br />explore options on how to make this project work on Site #1. However, the Council remains <br />undecided about site location. <br />02/14/2017 NOTES <br />o By consensus, the Council is generally supportive of Site location #1, and has invited Stone Brook to <br />bring forward a purchase agreement. <br />o The Council generally supports a road connection (Sunwood to Veterans). Some Councilmembers <br />were in support of a public road connection specifically. The Council didn't have enough information <br />to provide final direction on this item (public or private). <br />o The Council believes the internal road connection, as shown in master plan B, from east to west, is <br />important to the Council. Also, proper easements are important to allow the site to function as a <br />single master -planned block. <br />Page 15 of 15 <br />