Laserfiche WebLink
(4) Location of existing utility stubs. <br />Assistant City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama explained per Council <br />direction four professional drafted development scenarios were being offered for Commission <br />consideration/discussion. It was noted the Council requested this case be reviewed one more <br />time by the Planning Commission before the Council made a final decision. Staff reported the <br />Council would like to receive feedback from the Planning Commission on the four concepts. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Anderson thanked staff for the thorough detail included in each of the four site <br />plans. He stated he supported Concept B and Concept A. <br />Commissioner Nosan respected the wishes of Stone Brooke. She believed they would be a <br />welcome addition to The COR and would draw people to this area. She indicated she supported <br />both Concepts A and B. <br />Commissioner Anderson recommended Yolite Street be a thru street. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated commercial day care centers were an allowed use in COR2. He <br />supported Yolite being a thru street as well. He commented if the City chose not to sell because <br />of land price, he would understand, but otherwise he supported Concept B. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported staff would continue to work through the <br />Yolite Street connection. <br />Commissioner Brauer understood the state looks at daycare centers and early childhood <br />education and two separate things. He described how the two differed. He appreciated the fact <br />that Stone Brooke wanted to be something different. He believed the proposed use fit the zone <br />and in principle he would offer his support of the request for Concept B. <br />Commissioner Anderson recommended the Stone Brooke Academy have two entrance points for <br />traffic flow purposes. <br />Commissioner VanScoy reported educational facilities are not allowed in COR2. <br />Commissioner Surma stated he liked Concept B but wanted to see the conversation postponed <br />until the applicant could come before the Commission. <br />Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Nosan, to recommend that City <br />Council pursue negotiating a Purchase Agreement with conditions. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, Nosan, Brauer, and <br />Surma. Voting No: VanScoy. Absent: None. <br />Planning Commission/February 2, 2017 <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />