My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
06/02/80
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1980
>
06/02/80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:41:03 PM
Creation date
9/1/2004 10:21:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
06/02/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACTION: <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec said that this case will come under the review of <br />commercial properties meeting on May 22, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. <br />because it is the commercial values that are causing the problem here. <br /> <br />Mrs. Jim Graves, 15041 Juniper Ridge Dr., Plat #91300, Parcel ~300 <br />Mrs. Graves said they had a market analysis done on their home by a local realtor <br />and the market value is $89,600 and her estimated market value is $90,000. <br />She questioned how the estimated market value was computed. <br /> <br />Councilman Cox said the assessors are trying to get the estimates close to the <br />real market values. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec said there is a set square footage on each parcel they go by. <br /> <br />Assessor Wirz went over the figures on her property with her. <br /> <br />ACTION: No board action. <br /> <br />Mr. John Mueller, 14633 Bowers Drive, Plate #89230, Parcel ~2110 & 2120 <br />Mr. Mueller questioned the comparative value and tax on his two empty'lots <br />which are side by side. The estimated market value on one is $1000 more <br />than on the other and the tax on the higher one is 100% greater. He said he <br />felt it to be questionable that the taxes are 100% greater. <br /> <br />Assessor Wirz said the one lot is a homestead and the other is not. <br /> <br />Mr. Mueller explained he was talking about the gross tax. <br /> <br />County Assessor Weisbrich said the gross taxes are derived from homestead and <br />non-homestead classifications. <br /> <br />Assessor Wirz said he determined estimated market value and because one parcel <br />joined his property and other other bne didn't, he gave him a break on the one <br />that joined his property. <br /> <br />Mr. Mueller asked that the other lot be reduced also since it also joins his <br />property. <br /> <br />Assessor Wirz said he would consider lowering it for this year but not for last <br />year. <br /> <br />Much discussion ensued on questions regarding these two lots. <br /> <br />ACTION: To reduce Plat 89320, Parcel 2110 valUe from $6000 to $5000 because <br /> it is adjacent to the other lot and a homestead lot. <br /> <br />Mr. Ben Deemer, 14542 Nowthen Blvd. N.W., Plat #89225, Parcel #3980 <br />Mr. Deemer questioned the increase in estimated market value from $62,800 <br />to $73,000. He said he didn't feel the house was worth that price because <br />the roof needs to be replaced. He said he wouldn't argue with that assessment <br />after he gets the roof redone. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec told Mr. Deemer that since he paid $64,000 for the property <br />in 1978 and the valuation is now $73,000, it is the same 13% increase which <br />everyone else received. <br /> <br />BOARD OF REVIEW <br />May 12, 1980 <br /> Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.