07/07/80 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2. Request for Splitting of Outlot "A" Rolling Greens; Case of Art Raudio ~. Raudio said as long as 0utlot "A" Rolling Greens doesn't conflict with anything, he would like to get it on the market. He explained there are two reasons it is an outlot: 1) There was a question regarding the soil there and 2) they thought it could be a commercial corner, but the city had since decided against commercial there. He said the city wanted to get 0utlot "B" for drainage problems and they will deed Outlot "B" outright to the city, but he does want to get something done with Outlot "A". He said Outlot "A" is 3½ acres and he has never had soil tests taken on it. Councilman Cox said he remembers it as being left as a drainage outlot but it has since been changed. He explained that there can be no driveways on 167th because it is a thoroughfare street or on County Road #5. He said it has to be determined whether it can be a buildable lot. Councilman Reimann said being~tr. Raudio is the owner, he has to prove to the city that it is a buildable lot. Mr. Raudio asked if a variance can be given on the driveways. Councilman Mickelson said he would not have any trouble with it if Mr. Raudio can show evidence that the soil is good. Mr. Raudio said he didn't want to pay $200 to $300 for soil tests and find out he can't build on the lot any way. It is the concensus of the council that if Outlot "A" Rolling Greens is determined to be a buildable lot, if it meets soil criteria and is not a drainage problem, Mr. Raudio will be allowed to split it and plat it. Mr. Raudio said as is his understanding, he would deed the south half of Outlot "B" to the city for drainage. He asked if there was a way of conveying title on this without paying the taxes and if the taxes could be put on other property so he could deed it to the city. City Administrator Schnelle suggested meeting with Mr. Ed Fields and Mr. LeFebvre on this because they will benefit on this too. Councilman Cox said the easement should go directly to the county. It is important that County #5 and Highway #49 are.taken care of because the situation there isn't getting any better. 3. Request for Adoption of Final Resolution Regarding Industrial Revenue Bonds; Case of Mr. Charles Soderholm Motion by Councilman Cox and seconded by Counci]m~n Sorteberg to adopt Resolution #80-51 Providing for the Issuance and Sale of Revenue Bonds Pursuant to Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, to Provide Funds to be Loaned to Charles B. Soderholm and Shirley A. Soderholmfor Industrial Development Project. Motion carried. Voting yes-Councilmen Reimann, Sorteberg, Mickelson and Cox. Voting no-None. Please refer to resolution file for Resolution #80-51. C/June 10, 1980 Page 8