Laserfiche WebLink
· ! <br /> <br /> PLANNING 'COMMISSION 'BUSINESS <br /> <br />City Engineer Raatikka commented on the Ramsey Ridge Sketch Plan, which was <br />presented for approval. <br /> <br /> a) The 22 single-family lots which lie in the rural service a~ea all <br /> conform to City code. <br /> <br /> b) The lots which lie Northwesterly of Anoka County-Road No. 63 may have <br /> a restricted access to the rqad. This must be checked out with the <br /> County as we3_l as the City. <br /> <br /> c) The soils.within the plat consist of marsh, 'muck and fine sand, <br /> It is heavily wooded-with pine t~ees and could be a fire hazard. <br /> <br /> d) If no bonding is required, it must have--a minimum of l0 percent pa~k <br /> dedication ~. <br /> <br /> e) There were no contours shown on the sketch plan. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson said the Park Board has not ~eviewed the referenced sketch <br />plan yet, but they will do so next week. <br /> <br />Mm. Charles Peterson and Mr, Bob Rohlin were present regarding Ramsey 'Ridge. <br />The p~op&rty is owned by Mr. Peterson. <br /> <br />Ron West suggested moving Sapphire Street to the left because the bend there <br />is so Sharp. <br /> <br />Kathy Schneider noted that two immediate adjacent developments have parks. <br />Ben Deemer said his feeling is to get the money instead of park land. <br /> <br />The~ consensus of the commission is to recommend proceeding to the preliminary <br />plan stage for Ramsey Ridge and to get the Park Board and the County Highway <br />recommendations taking into consideration the comments from the City Engineer <br />and the letter from Consulting Engineers Diversified, Inc. <br /> <br />P g Z Regula~ Meeting Page 3 8/4/80 <br /> <br /> <br />