Laserfiche WebLink
,I <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />City of Andover in the officJ.~l ne%.~spaper, the Anoka Union. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Van Wagner. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #6: Mr. Gerald Peltzer Regarding Temporary Mobile Home Permit: <br /> <br />Payor Gamec stated that he received a call from Mr. Peltzer stating th~J.t he <br />....~ould be unable to attend tonight's meeting, that he is contemplating a move <br />to Missouri and would like another extension in time. Mayor Gamec staked that <br />}~e informed Mr. Peltzer that if another extension were granted it would be on <br />~he provision that Mr. Peltzer pay the $300 permit fee. <br /> <br />Berg stated that it would be against ordinance to grant another extension. <br /> <br />¢7~uncilmember Reimann stated that the City should start proceedings to have <br />the mobile home removed because Mr. Peltzer has not been at all cooperative. <br /> <br />7~7otion by Councilme;mber Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to <br />authorize City Staff to initiate proceedings to have the mobile home removed. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Mayor Gamec stated that Mr. Peltzer indicated that if <br />any action, other than an extension of time, is taken, would Council consider <br />delaying that action until the next regular Council meeting, at which time <br />Mr. Peltzer could be present. Councilmember Sorteberg stated that Mr. Peltzer <br />has had plenty of opportunities to cooperate with the City on this mat~er. <br />Councilmember Cox feels that it should be indicated to Mr. Peltzer that it <br />was hard for Council to take any extension action when he hasn't even posted <br />bond yet. Councilmember Reimann stated that action should start right away - <br />regarding the bond also. '' <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Van Wagner. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #7: Landfill: <br /> <br />Marilyn Gallagher reported on the September 28, 1982 Anoka County Board <br />Meeting that she and Councilmember Cox attended. At this meeting, Ed <br />Fields introduced a letter which he had received from Councilmember Cox <br />in regards to Ramsey landfill proposed Site "P". Ms. Gallagher stated <br />that a motion was made and passed to recommend Metro Council reveuse <br />previous action taken to include the existing landfill as part of Site "P" <br />and any further action be delayed in order that Ramsey can have a study <br />performed regarding Ramsey site being included as a landfill candidate. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated that the next step is to have City Attorney find <br />out where Ramsey stands with regards to the Metro Council now. Council- <br />member Cox also requested that Mr. Goodrich submit to the County Ramsey's <br />interpretation of above mentioned motion before the minutes of that meeting <br />~re documented. Co%mcilmember Cox also stated that if Ramsey does go ahead <br />with having a study of the site performed, it should not be in conjunction <br />w~th the Co~ty. <br /> <br />l~r. Schnelle stated that if Ramsey qualifies for a solid waste landfill, <br />it will automatically qualify for a hazardous waste landfill. <br /> <br />C/September 28, 1982 <br /> Page 10 <br /> <br /> <br />