My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/24/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 01/24/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:03:00 PM
Creation date
3/7/2017 12:09:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/24/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Metropolitan Agencies <br /> • The Metropolitan Council must recognize the limitations of its authority and continue <br /> to work with cities in a collaborative, incentives-based manner; <br /> • The Metropolitan Council must recognize the various needs and capacities of its <br /> many partners, including but not limited to cities, counties, economic development <br /> authorities and nonprofit organizations, and its policies must be balanced and flexible <br /> in their approach; <br /> • Metropolitan counties, adjacent counties and school districts must be brought more <br /> thoroughly into the discussion due to the critical importance of facilities and services <br /> such as county roads and public schools in accommodating forecasted growth; and <br /> • Greater recognition must be given to the fact that the"true" metropolitan region <br /> extends beyond the traditional seven-county area and the need to work collaboratively <br /> with adjacent counties in Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the cities within those <br /> counties. The region faces environmental, transportation, and land use issues that <br /> cannot be solved by the seven-county metro area alone. Metro Cities supports an <br /> analysis to determine the impacts of Metropolitan Council's growth management <br /> policies and infrastructure investments on the growth and development of the collar <br /> counties, and the impacts of growth in the collar counties on the metropolitan area. <br /> 4-L Natural Resource Protection <br /> Metro Cities supports the Metropolitan Council's efforts to compile and maintain <br /> an inventory and assessment of regionally significant natural resources for the <br /> purpose of providing local communities with additional information and technical <br /> assistance. The state and region play significant roles in the protection of natural <br /> resources. Any steps taken by the state or Metropolitan Council regarding the protection <br /> of natural resources must recognize that: <br /> • The protection of natural resources is significant to a multi-county area that is home <br /> to more than 50 percent of the state's population and a travel destination for many <br /> more. Given the limited availability of resources and the artificial nature of the <br /> metropolitan area's borders, neither the region nor individual metropolitan <br /> communities would be well served by assuming primary responsibility for financing <br /> and protecting these resources; <br /> • The completion of local Natural Resource Inventories and Assessments (NRUA)is <br /> not a regional system nor is it a required component of local comprehensive plans <br /> under the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act; <br /> • The protection of natural resources should be balanced with the need to accommodate <br /> growth and development, reinvest in established communities, encourage more <br /> affordable housing and provide transportation and transit connections; and <br /> 2017 Legislative Policies 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.