My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/24/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 01/24/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:03:00 PM
Creation date
3/7/2017 12:09:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/24/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transportation <br /> 5-0 Transit Taxing District <br /> The transit taxing district, which funds the capital cost of transit service in the <br /> Metropolitan Area through the property tax system, is inequitable. Because the <br /> boundaries of the transit taxing district do not correspond with any rational service line <br /> nor is being within the boundaries a guarantee to receive service, cities in the taxing <br /> district or out of the taxing district are contributing unequally to the transit service in the <br /> Metropolitan Area. This inequity should be corrected. <br /> Metro Cities supports a stable revenue source to fund both the capital and operating <br /> costs for transit at the Metropolitan Council. However, Metro Cities does not <br /> support the expansion of the transit taxing district without a corresponding increase <br /> in service and an overall increase in operational funds. To do so would create <br /> additional property taxes without a corresponding benefit. <br /> 5-P Complete Streets <br /> A complete street may include: sidewalks, bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders), special <br /> bus lanes, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops, frequent and safe <br /> crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, <br /> narrower travel lanes and more. <br /> A complete street in a rural area will differ from a complete street in a highly urban area, <br /> but both are designed to balance safety and convenience for everyone using the road. <br /> Metro Cities supports options in state design guidelines for streets that would give <br /> cities greater flexibility to: <br /> • Safely accommodate all modes of travel; <br /> • Address storm water needs; and <br /> • Ensure livability in the appropriate context for each city. <br /> However, Metro Cities opposes state imposed mandates that would increase street <br /> infrastructure improvement costs in locations and instances where providing access <br /> for alternative modes including cycling and walking are deemed unnecessary or <br /> inappropriate as determined by local jurisdictions. <br /> 2017 Legislative Policies 58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.