Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> <br /> ~52. The statement 'There is a s==.-r..ificant probability that these soils do <br /> nbt preclude seepage down into ~ ~drock aquifer' is the Hearing Examiner's <br />m ovm speculation and not supports: ky the record, fact, geologist,s <br /> In <br /> the <br /> report concludes the opposite, iS---e- Exhibits OD, QQQ and discussion of Soil: <br /> and Aquifer Conditions in this ~=rt.) : <br />m <br />m <br /> ~54. "Ho suggestion for a liner ~ r. onitoring-system for a processing facility <br /> was discussed in the record. ~'-~ -Cie, miner failed to note that a landfi)l <br />m and processing facility ~htr.~ is an above-ground tndust, rial operation) are <br /> a <br /> radically different operations ~-q~ precautions for one would not necessarily <br /> be applicable to the other. ~ <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />-m-: <br />m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br /> <br />~55. The Examiner's speculati~ on unmapped wetlands and their characteristics <br /> is not substantiated nor even ~.tioned in the record. The examiner at various <br /> ttmes'-refers to wetlands in t~ -~rea as a 'lake-wetland complex"' (Finding <br /> ~SE ),'lakes and ponds' (~58), ~i .~rtant lake-wetland complex' (p.-15) <br /> although nothing in the recorc: ~iscusses lakes, ponds nor-the significance <br /> of we:lands in the .area. The --?_~iner fails to note that all. wetlands designated <br /> as public waters have been remodel from the area. <br /> <br />~58 and 59. The DIOR identifie~-. 7 ~'etlands but no lakes or ponds within the <br />are~, The wetlands were remo~-~ from the area prior to the hearing and this <br />fact was discussed at the hearlr~. (T. p. 16, 20-~-1, eve.) Since there <br />are no identified public lakes cr ponds in the area, the 1000' shoreland <br />· is not applicable. {Exhibit LId.) : <br /> <br /> ~5. The entire area is zoned ~ planned for-indUStrial development. ~othing' ' <br /> in the record.discussed any c~,-_=t agricultural uses of the area, nor will <br /> the designation or deletion of t~ area change its existing and planned industrial <br /> usage. <br /> <br /> Staff Recommendations <br />m if the Board chooses to tnclu~ ~ RamseY area in the inventory'of preferred <br /> · a~e'as, the staff recommends dele,~on of the area north of Industry Ave. and <br /> west of the eastern edge of tI~ ~tew~ ~orth.lndustrtal Airport. This reduction: <br /> <br />1) Provides additional as~-r?_nce of buffer to residence~'.located north <br /> of the area; -- - ' <br /> <br />'2). Excludes the airport p,--:L-J~ _rty. and most, t'f not all, of. any maJor.~estricted <br /> zones associated with ~ snds of the runways; " <br /> <br />3) Includes the .area near~, to the existing sewer line (located at the <br /> border of. Ramsey);' <br /> <br />4)' Includes area'within o~-~-ile of receiving s~ream; <br /> <br />5) Excludes. Area P being c:rr.~i~ered as.a Candidate landftl-l, stte.' <br /> <br /> <br />