Laserfiche WebLink
UR -10,800 square foot lots (not including the street) with sewer - <br />43,560 square foot lots without sewer - 6,000 square foot lots with <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD) - Uses: single-family and duplexes. <br /> <br />The question here is where to allow duplexes? <br /> <br />Run West stated that they should be part of commercial or industrial areas <br />and could be used as a buffer between these areas and residential. <br />They should fall into the Urban Service Area.since multiple housing will <br />require sewer. <br /> <br />Ben Deemer suggested duplexes be part of a PUD in the Urban Area and that <br />it could be used as a buffer with the same density of one per acre. <br /> <br />Mr. Marston question if they would be considered as permitted uses or <br />conditional uses? ~ A permitted use would have to be 'spelled out in the plan. <br />The problem with conditional or-special~uses~is~that~peopte~will object and .... <br />that will'make-it difficult~for ~them~to be-built~' <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec commented that the City would like to limit duplexes. <br /> <br />Mr. Marston said that when someone comes into plat and there is the <br />distinction between single family and duplex lots the City would have the <br />right at that time to go through the criteria in the Plan and that may give <br />a certain amount of flexibility. <br /> <br />Ben Deemer added that a PUD would cut them off and control this matter. <br /> <br />Mr. Marston stated that the trend is shifting, away from segregating <br />different land uses, people living in more density per acre. D° you want <br />to use a PUD where you would be combining single family and duplexes? <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson said that it could only be allowed in the Urban Area. <br /> <br />Ben Deemer said he is not against this and it could be a way to increase the <br />density around marginal land in the Urban Area. <br /> <br />UMB-M-Medium Density Residential - 5 to 15 units per acre. Uses: <br />medium density residential, offices and retail with PUD. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson asked if we did designat~ UMB-H that if this would be <br />permitted only for UMB-.H with no single family homes allowed. Answer - yes. <br /> <br />UMB-M would be allowed in H but H cOuld not be put in M and treat it <br />no different that Urban Residential, one unit per acre would be allowed. <br />Anything higher than duplex would require public.utilities. . <br /> <br />Mr. Marston will try to have more information on this issue on February 4th <br />and suggest areas where this would be located. <br /> <br />Ben Deemer added that UMB-H or M should not be located on the highest ground <br />around. <br /> <br />WORKSHOP MEETING <br />PLANNING & ZONING <br />January 15, 1980 <br /> Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />