My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/12/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 02/12/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:00:54 PM
Creation date
9/3/2004 9:02:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/12/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS <br /> <br />MARKET MUSINGS <br /> <br />January, 1980 <br /> <br />1979 commenced with the Bond Buyer Index at 6.58% and ended with a 7.23% BBI - only a 10% <br />increase, which is less than the Inflation rate. The Iow index of the year was 6.08% on July 5 and <br />the high was 7.38% on October 25 and November 22. The average was 6Jr0%. For 1978 the Iow <br />was 5.58% and the high was 6.67% with an average of 6.02%. During the early part of 1979's <br />upswing of interest rates, tax-exempts did not keep pace and it was a seller's (issuer's) market. <br />But as the year progressed, tax-exempt rates came into line and may be expected to stay there <br />for the next several months at least. <br /> <br />One of the abnormalities of the year was the "flattening" of the yield curve as the spread <br />between short and long-term rates decreased. In fact, as of October 25, rates for tax-exempts in <br />the less than one year maturity range were higher than rates out to about seven years. One S-I <br />client with a Moody's MIG-I rating for its one-year certificates did not receive an offer at bid- <br />opening time within the statutory 7% limit but probably could have sold three-year obligations. <br /> <br />Whither do we go? IKhomeini and Afghanistan have shattered our crystall ball! All things being <br />normal, rates should improve, but then there is INFLATION! More certain than a forecast of <br />rates is a foreseeable need for even more marketing ingenuity and sophistication. <br /> <br />'TIS THE SEASON <br /> <br />Deciphering and analyzing Annual Financial Reports is one of the biggest challenges for those <br />involved in the examination of municipal credits. From the vantage point of underwriters, rating <br />agencies and financial advisors, such Financial Reports run the gamut from being exceptionally <br />well done to suggesting that there must be some pages missing. <br /> <br />At this time of year, most communities are beginning to put together data for fiscal year 1979, <br />and it therefore may be appropriate to analyze the accounting/auditing process being used, and <br />the form and substance of the final product. <br /> <br />Because the Annual Report is so crucial for the analysis of a municipal credit in preparation for a <br />bond sale, S-I is particularly sensitive to special aspects of the Report. This sensitivity is based <br />upon what the rating agencies and underwriters tell us they expect of the Report. The following <br />areas are critical to the worthiness of a Report to be used for a rating and to provide information <br />necessary to bidders for municipal obligations. <br /> <br />Timeliness - It may not be next to godliness, but it must be close. The most detailed and <br />accurate financial report is of little value if it is not available until a year or more after the end <br />of the fiscal year. If a financial report or audit consistently is completed more than six months <br />after year-end, these questions should be asked: <br /> <br />Is the lateness an internal problem? Have meetings with the accountant(s) been <br />deferred all too often? Are department heads or other staff members submitting <br />necessary information in a timely manner? Is a new computer system hindering <br />more than helping, or is it being used a~ a scapegoat for most any problem? (We <br />have yet to find a computer progammed to defend itself.) <br /> <br />Is the problem an external one, with crucial data not promptly supplied by federal, <br />state or county units or are the auditors always "slow"? <br /> <br />800 OsDorn Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102~iii!ii!~) 222-4241 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.