Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 <br /> <br />series of questions should be discussed in the counties to see where <br />Anoka may fit into the total mental health care system. Someone should <br />be sending to all catchment counties questions on admissions, discharge <br />criteria, etc. Dr. Young said this could be looked at by department <br />staff and a proposal submitted at the next meeting. He emphasized that <br />no major changes will be made at Anoka SH without first discussing them <br />with the committee. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rodin was of the opinion that the hospital must identify its <br />capabilities and limitations in providing mental health services. Areas <br />with violent patients and insufficient staffing should be identified; <br />buildings with inadequate housekeeping services should be identified, <br />etc. The hospital must be able to make a clear and supportable statement: <br />"This is what we can handle," and the people in the catchment area must <br />then be made aware of these capabilities and limitations. <br /> <br /> Mr-. Parachini felt that the compliance officer proposed for Anoka <br />could possibly be used to contact the courts, etc. and explain what the <br />situation is at Anoka. There is an obvious lack of information. Mr. <br />Rodin suggested that two or three people from this committee and Mr. <br />Lightburn might pay a visit to the Probate Courts in Ramsey and Hennepin <br />Counties, etc. and ask for support from them. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dahlman said the MI, CD, Planning and other hospital advisory <br />committees are a resource for this committee. Advisory committee mem- <br />bers on this committee were asked to communicate back to their respective <br />committees and to discuss how their committee can be dovetailed into <br />the larger advisory committee structure. <br /> <br /> The next meetin~ will be held from 4:00-6:00 p.m., Tuesday, March <br />It was agreed that these meetings will be held on Tuesday from now on <br />rather than Monday. <br /> <br /> <br />