My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 01/12/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2017
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 01/12/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:13:31 PM
Creation date
3/14/2017 10:57:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
01/12/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(3) EDA Feedback <br /> • The EDA first reviewed this site 12/08/2016. <br /> • The EDA is very interested in this project,and would like to welcome Stone Brook to Ramsey(and The <br /> COR). The EDA wants this deal to happen,and is excited to work with Stone Brook to find a solution. The <br /> EDA understands the many benefits this project can bring to Ramsey. <br /> • The EDA was generally interested in obtaining more information from staff(RE the Yolite Street <br /> discussion/the remnant lots),and hearing back from Stone Brook(on other potential site locations), <br /> before making a final recommendation on this particular site. <br /> • The EDA was generally concerned about this specific site location/site layout. The EDA is most interested <br /> in a comprehensive approach to developing this larger site (nearly 5 acres). The EDA generally believes a <br /> master developer can most effectively/efficiently plan around the current site limitations/challenges <br /> (listed below). <br /> ■ Yolite intersection/connection. <br /> The EDA was concerned this connection is un-needed,and a waste of public dollars (originally <br /> $394K total cost, now about$284K). The COR master plan no longer calls for the Yolite <br /> connection. The EDA was generally open to discussing a private connection/and or private stub <br /> road solution. <br /> ■ Remnant Parcels <br /> The EDA was concerned with the relatively fixed location of existing public infrastructure (below). <br /> These items create development layout/lot size limitations—which restrict future development <br /> options. Please see"Staff Feedback Section"for details/background. <br /> (A) Water/sewer stub existing locations in Sunwood. <br /> (B) Location of existing public well in SW corner of larger site. <br /> (C) An existing storm water line running down the future Yolite Street. <br /> (D) Existing Yolite Street intersection on Sunwood Drive. <br /> This proposed Stone Brook 1-acre site will solidify two remnant parcels. The EDA is generally <br /> concerned about the potential affects these remnant parcels will have on future development <br /> projects. Please see "Staff Feedback Section"for details/background. <br /> Page 12 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.