My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 01/12/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2017
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 01/12/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:13:31 PM
Creation date
3/14/2017 10:57:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
01/12/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(2) Staff Feedback <br /> • Staff did not spent a significant amount of time reviewing these options. Generally,yes,these sites would <br /> work form a physical site layout perspective. <br /> • These are nice sites(from a development readiness perspective). They include internal roadways, <br /> utilities, mass grading, have been platted, external arterial infrastructure in place,etc. <br /> • Locating Stone Brook on these sites would make for a much easier/cleaner discussion for the City(from a <br /> real estate development perspective/master developer perspective). These sites would generally allow <br /> for this type of use(from a zoning perspective). <br /> • Staff would like to note—there are three potential issues with this site location for Stone Brook: <br /> o Stone Brook only needs 0.9 - 1.0 acres of land. Wasted land would result from development of <br /> Stone Brook on these pre-determined sized sites. Could range from about.25 acre to .45 acre of <br /> wasted land (depending on the site/size of Stone Brook). Because of the pre-determined/pre- <br /> platted lots—it would be challenging to reconfigure lots today. This would also result in a missed <br /> opportunity for tax base. <br /> o These sites are considered premium sties, listed at premium prices($12 per square foot). These <br /> are arguably the only pad ready sites in The COR(most other sites will result in various policy/ <br /> development issues). Staff believes the City has the ability to capture more dollars in land <br /> proceeds on these sites(in comparison to what Stone Brook is offering—$3.00 psf). Selling these <br /> properties at$3.00 psf(or close to)—it would likely trigger a business subsidy process/request— <br /> which Stone Brook is trying to avoid. <br /> o The policy question of"fit"does surface with this particular site location. Does a children's <br /> academy fit here (from a master developer perspective)? Or,was this area visioned for more <br /> traditional retail/restaurants? If the City does move forward with recommending this site <br /> location,staff believes this question may need to be discussed. <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.