Laserfiche WebLink
*10 year term,third lien, about$70,000. <br /> NOTE: staff has received conflicting information on the minimum required term for the EDA RLF. Staff has <br /> the perspective to attempt to minimize the city's loan term. There is a chance the EDA RLF will be required <br /> to match the SBA 20 year term. In that scenario,we would also need to have an exception to our EDA RLF <br /> Guidelines on maximum loan term (from 15 years to the SBA required 20). This question (RE term)will be <br /> answered if/when an actual application is brought forward(i.e. February). <br /> Funding Source: <br /> EDA RLF: about$300,000 balance. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Attached to this case is a MEMO/recommendation from ACG/Mike Mulrooney(the City's Economic <br /> Development Consultant). Generally speaking,both staff and ACG are comfortable with this policy exception. <br /> However,we would note the items below, and importance of good credit analysis (this policy exception isn't a loan <br /> approval). <br /> On the plus side: <br /> .This amendment would allow for use of these dollars in more traditional economic development scenarios <br /> (i.e.the commonly used SBA 504 situations). This fund is not used often today. <br /> .This scenario still requires 5%owner equity--some level of owner equity is always highly recommended in <br /> any project. <br /> .This still requires strict underwriting, and a credit-worthy tenant--this is always highly recommended, and <br /> would be by staff/ACG for this loan. <br /> On the minus side: <br /> .This puts the city in a greater position of risk (lower equity means greater chance of not being paid back in the <br /> event of a default).* <br /> .The city's position would be third in SBA deals (which again,puts the city in a higher position of risk)* <br /> *NOTE: these items are not unique to this specific situation. The very essence of why the City EDA RLF <br /> exists--is to cover financing gaps that the private sector would not normally fund alone (i.e. riskier situations). <br /> The question here is shades of grey/or various levels of comfort RE risk tolerance for the City. Are we okay <br /> with 5%equity rather than 10%on SBA deals--both are generally risky levels of equity--one is more risky. <br /> Action: <br /> Motion to Recommend the City Council: <br /> Allow for an exception to the EDA RLF Guidelines,to allow for minimum equity, in the amount of 5%, for <br /> American Print&Digital. <br /> -and- <br /> Direct staff to bring back a future case to discuss updating the EDA RLF Guidelines. <br /> Process for American Print&Digital: <br /> (1) EDA consider allowing policy exception (01/12/2017) <br /> (2) City Council consider allowing policy exception(01/24/2017) <br /> (3) EDA consider application/underwriting/awarding loan (02/09/2017) <br /> (4) City Council consider application/underwriting/awarding loan (02/14/2017) <br /> Attachments <br /> EDA RLF Guidlines <br /> ACG MEMO <br />