Laserfiche WebLink
(5) City Council Feedback <br /> 01/24/2017 NOTES <br /> o The City Council has indicated more information is needed before a final decision can be made(RE <br /> site location). The Council was concerned about the ramifications this single project(about 1 <br /> acre)would have on the development of the larger parcel/block(about 5 acres). The <br /> Council desires to know more about how the various development challenges associated with this <br /> site will play out in various development scenarios(i.e. Stone Brook proposal vs.single developer <br /> master planned site). <br /> o Per Council direction,various professional development scenarios were drafted for consideration/ <br /> discussion. The Council requested this case be reviewed one more time by the Planning <br /> Commission before the Council made a final decision. The Council would like to receive feedback <br /> from the Planning Commission on the attached four concepts. <br /> o The Council was generally very supportive of the use/proposed project. The Council would like to <br /> explore options on how to make this project work on Site#1. However,the Council remains <br /> undecided about site location. <br /> 02/14/2017 NOTES <br /> o By consensus,the Council is generally supportive of Site location#1,and has invited Stone Brook to <br /> bring forward a purchase agreement. <br /> o The Council generally supports a road connection (Sunwood to Veterans). Some Councilmembers <br /> were in support of a public road connection specifically. The Council didn't have enough information <br /> to provide final direction on this item (public or private). <br /> o The Council believes the internal road connection,as shown in master plan B,from east to west, is <br /> important to the Council. Also, proper easements are important to allow the site to function as a <br /> single master-planned block. <br /> Page 15 of 15 <br />