Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Policy Board (EPB) 5. 2. <br /> Meeting Date: 11/21/2016 <br /> By: Chris Anderson, Community <br /> Development <br /> Information <br /> Title: <br /> Consider Landscape and Tree Preservation Plans for Woodlands 4th Addition; Case of Lennar Corporation <br /> Purpose/Background: <br /> Lennar Corporation(the "Applicant")has submitted an application for both a Preliminary Plat and variance for <br /> their final phase of the Woodlands project,Woodlands 4th Addition. The project site is generally located north of <br /> Alpine Drive and east of Variolite St. A portion of Woodlands 4th Addition has already received Preliminary Plat <br /> approval;the Applicant has a purchase agreement in place with the property owner to the south to acquire <br /> approximately fifteen(15) acres that would be incorporated into Woodlands 4th Addition. This review is specific to <br /> this 'new'parcel,which is proposed to have thirteen (13)lots. <br /> Observations/Alternatives: <br /> The City's Natural Resources Inventory (NRI), completed in 2007, identifies a moderate quality wetland complex <br /> in and around the project area as well as altered,non-native plant communities in the area. Per the Tree Preservation <br /> Plan,the site is dominated by oak and ash trees. The City's new wetland setback and lot depth standard should aid <br /> in providing some additional protection of the wetland areas. <br /> The Tree Preservation Plan indicates that forty-three percent(43%) of the existing significant trees will be retained <br /> on site. However,the tree preservation standards in City Code are based on existing significant tree DBH inches <br /> rather than a simple count of trees. The Tree Preservation Plan will need to be updated to provide a total count of <br /> DBH inches for the site, as well as a breakdown of DBH inches that will be removed and preserved to determine if <br /> the project exceeds the removal threshold(in residential development, a project must retain at least forty percent <br /> [40%] of the DBH inches or is subject to reforestation requirements). <br /> In addition to the aforementioned revisions,the Tree Preservation Plan and the Grading and Drainage Plan both <br /> need to be updated to include several items. Tree Save fencing must be shown on both plans and shall be installed <br /> and then approved by the City prior to any clearing work. Also,because of the presence of oak stands, clearing will <br /> need to occur prior to April 15 or after July 15 to minimize exposure to oak wilt. Finally,the Applicant will also <br /> need to submit a plan outlining the precautionary steps to be taken on site to prevent the introduction of oak wilt. <br /> The Landscape Plan is generally acceptable. Staff has requested several notes be added to it for clarification <br /> purposes. This includes a note stating that any deviation from the planting plan requires the approval of the City <br /> prior to installation(this is to prevent prohibited species from being installed)and the need for a tree planting detail <br /> to assure that the trees are properly planted(primarily focused on correct planting depth). <br /> The project site does have some floodplain areas.No detailed study has been completed by FEMA and thus,this <br /> floodplain is classified as General Floodplain District. This boundary will need to be added to the plan set. If any <br /> proposed disturbance will occur within this floodplain boundary,the Applicant will need to submit additional <br /> information to determine the regulatory flood protection elevation and to determine if disturbance would occur in <br /> the flood fringe or floodway district. <br /> One of the the thirteen(13)proposed lots does not meet the lot depth requirement. Lot 2, Block 1 is, at its narrowest <br /> depth,ninety-five (95)feet deep,which is short of the required 100 foot depth.When reviewing the exhibit <br /> provided by the Applicant, it appears that the depth deficiency impacts approximately 125 square feet of area, <br />