My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 01/18/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2017
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 01/18/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 11:52:46 AM
Creation date
3/14/2017 11:40:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
01/18/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Assessment Worksheet Process Chapter <br /> Environmental Assessment Worksheet Process <br /> EAW Guidelines provides information about preparing an An EAW is also prepared as the first step in scoping an EIS <br /> Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW)to determine if required for a project.A different approach is necessary to <br /> whether an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)is needed for a answering questions on the EAW when it is used for <br /> project.The EAW is defined by state statute as a"brief document scoping purposes. <br /> which is designed to set out the basic facts necessary to determine <br /> whether an EIS is required for a proposed action."(Minn. Stat. § Prohibition on governmental approvals and on <br /> 116D.04 Subd. la) construction during review <br /> The purpose of the EAW process is to disclose information Whenever an EAW is mandatory or has been ordered,or when <br /> about potential environmental impacts of the project. It is not an a petition for an EAW has been properly filed,state law directs <br /> approval process_The information disclosed in the EAW process that no final governmental decision may be made to grant a <br /> has two functions:to determine whether an EIS is needed and to permit,approve or begin a project and that construction on the <br /> indicate how the project can be modified to lessen its project may not begin until environmental review is completed. <br /> environmental impacts. Such modifications may be imposed as When an EAW is required,review is completed when either the <br /> permit conditions by regulatory agencies.The information RGU determines that no EIS is needed—issuance of a negative <br /> comes from three sources:the EAW,comments made on the declaration—or when the EIS is completed and found adequate. <br /> EAW and responses by the Responsible Government Unit A final governmental decision is one that conveys rights to the <br /> (RGU)and project proposer to the comments.All three sources project proposer,whether the last or an intermediate decision. <br /> are important,but the EAW generally provides the most Final decisions include preliminary as well as final plat <br /> significant information. approvals since they convey rights that may be difficult to alter <br /> or undo,conditional use permits and zoning decisions if <br /> The EAW process involves four major steps: associated with a specific project. The Guide to Minnesota <br /> Environmental Review Rules provides additional information <br /> Step 1.The project proposer supplies all necessary data to the about prohibited approvals. <br /> Responsible Governmental Unit,which is assigned <br /> responsibility to conduct the review according to the EQB How the RGU is determined <br /> rules. Environmental Quality Board rules(Minnesota Rules Chapter <br /> Step 2.The RGU prepares the EAW by completing the 4410.0500)assign the responsibility of preparing EAWs and <br /> standard form supplied by the Environmental Quality Board. determining the need for EISs to specific units of government. <br /> The specific unit of government determined to have <br /> Step 3.The EAW is distributed with public notice of its responsibility for the EAW preparation is the RGU.Commonly, <br /> availability for review and comment.The comment period is 30 the RGU is the unit with the greatest responsibility for <br /> calendar days.Certain state,federal and local agencies always approving or supervising the project as a whole.For projects <br /> receive EAWs for review.Any person may review and comment that exceed a threshold which requires a mandatory EAW,the <br /> in writing on an EAW.A public meeting to receive oral rules that define these categories also identify the designated <br /> comments is optional at the discretion of the RGU,but is not RGU.For projects where a citizen petition for an EAW was <br /> commonly held. submitted to EQB,the EQB chair or staff designee assigns the <br /> Step 4.The RGU responds to the comments received and makes RGU consistent with the Rules.If a unit of government orders <br /> a decision on the need for an EIS based on the EAW,comments an EAW or responds to an EAW request of the project proposer, <br /> received and responses to the comments.The RGU and other that unit is the RGU.A state agency is always the RGU for <br /> units of government may require modifications to the project as projects it will conduct. <br /> part of their permits to mitigate environmental impacts as <br /> disclosed through the EAW process. Responsibility for EAW preparation and costs <br /> While the RGU prepares the EAW,project proposers are <br /> When an EAW is required required to supply to the RGU any data or other information in <br /> An EAW is required for any project listed in the mandatory EAW their possession or to which they have reasonable access.Once <br /> categories in Minnesota Rules part 4410.4300.This listing,as received,the RGU reviewing the submitted information for <br /> well as mandatory EIS and exemption categories,can also be completeness. Often,an RGU will hire consultants to prepare <br /> found in the EQB's Guide to Minnesota Environmental Review all or part of the EAW or to independently review the <br /> Rules.An EAW is also required whenever any governmental unit proposer's submittal.This topic is covered in detail in the next <br /> with approval authority over the project determines that available chapter. <br /> evidence indicates that the project may have the potential for The environmental review statutes do not address the issue of <br /> significant environmental effects.This is called a discretionary charging for EAW costs,however,some local units of <br /> review and typically occurs in response to a citizen petition. government have enacted ordinances that allow them to recoup <br /> Environmental Quality Board EAW Guidelines—October 2013 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.