My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 01/18/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2017
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 01/18/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 11:52:46 AM
Creation date
3/14/2017 11:40:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
01/18/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item-by-item guidance Chapter <br /> 18. Transportation <br /> The EAW must provide a reasonable estimate of the impacts on transportation and traffic associated with the <br /> proposed project. For projects with only minor traffic generation,it is not necessary to provide the maximum <br /> peak hour traffic generated.The trip generation rates used to estimate traffic, (such as trips per household,) and <br /> their sources should be identified. It is recommended that the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip <br /> Generation Manual be used,unless other numbers are justified for the particular project. <br /> The level of detail of the analysis should be commensurate to the amount of traffic generated and the existing <br /> level of traffic congestion. Therefore,the more likely the traffic impacts from the project will contribute to a <br /> growing transportation problem,the more detail that should be provided in the EAW. The analysis should <br /> consider not only the adjoining roads near the project site,but also other connecting roads that may be adversely <br /> impacted. One commonly accepted measure of congestion is the level-of-service and delay times.The EAW must <br /> also address the project's potential impact on the regional transportation system. <br /> If a traffic analysis is being prepared because of the requirements of the local unit of government,that analysis <br /> should also be used or included in the EAW,provided that it is based on generally accepted principles of traffic <br /> analysis.The RGU for the EAW should be consulted before the EAW analysis is prepared. If vehicular air quality <br /> impacts are assessed, as described in EAW Item 16.b,the vehicle air quality analysis method used in the EAW <br /> should be consistent with the assumptions of the traffic analysis,including mitigation. <br /> Regardless of location,if the peak hour traffic generated by the project exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips <br /> exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW.Use the format and procedures <br /> described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Traffic Impact Study Guidance or a similar local <br /> guidance. <br /> If the RGU is pursuing a traffic study,they may want to consider including crash data or other traffic safety issues, <br /> even though they may not be "environmental"under the definition included in Minnesota Rules 4410.0200 Subp. <br /> 23. <br /> Additional Resources: <br /> • Mn/DOT's Traffic Impact Study Guidance is available at: <br /> hiip://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmana e�pdf/manualchapters/chapter5.pdf <br /> Environmental Quality Board EAW Guidelines—October 2013 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.