My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/06/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/06/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:25:59 AM
Creation date
3/14/2017 12:17:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/06/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of something around$100,000 per impervious acre- and using the northwest quadrant of the COR to demonstrate how this <br /> might work,take the approximately 30 acres(north of the parkway and west of the Lake Ramsey),multiplied by 80%impervious <br /> land cover (buildings, parking lots, streets, etc.) equals 24 acres, multiplied by$75,000 per acre (mid-range cost for shared <br /> approach)and the City would receive$1,800,000 from property owners/developers to design and build the system(see Estimate <br /> of Probable Construction Costs-Greenway Trail+Stormwater Management Corridor). <br /> 2. Define permanent stormwater/utility/recreation/access easements(that run with the land)that will reserve adequate acreage to <br /> accommodate district system design and construction. <br /> 3. Draft agreements (we have a successful template/model for this) between property owners/developers and the City to clearly <br /> define relationships,roles/responsibilities,timelines and other considerations. <br /> Scenario 3 - Metropolitan Council - Livable Communities Demonstration <br /> Account (LCDA) <br /> This Scenario is based on recent success securing grant monies from the Metropolitan Council to support design and construction of <br /> public realm improvements.Over the past several years,their project selection/award criteria has changed somewhat to reflect more <br /> contemporary and innovative development approaches.Toward that end,they are no longer funding purely infrastructure projects, <br /> but are more interested in proposals that link specific development sites with <br /> public transit,district systems(stormwater,parking,etc.)and creative design <br /> of`signature public places'. <br /> For example, in a recent successful application for the Prospect North <br /> Redevelopment District, the Metropolitan Council LCDA awarded one -' 'a W <br /> Million dollars for improvements to Fourth Street(named"Green Fourth"), 3 ; <br /> but also to be shared with the adjacent Cornerstone Development (mixed- I ' <br /> use, housing over retail). Basically this one-third, two-thirds split is a <br /> mandate intended to thoughtfully integrate design solutions for both <br /> projects, including streetscape, stormwater management and other district <br /> system elements. <br /> Strategies: <br /> 1. Seek willing development partners who will participate in shared-project <br /> scenarios similar to the example described above; with a specific focus <br /> on joint funding applications to help pay for various elements of your <br /> proposed signature parks and public spaces. - ' <br /> 2. Carefully blend the interface between public and private property, .'. -E - s'� aa .F� <br /> particularly along the edges of proposed signature parks and public <br /> spaces,promoting flexible use,vibrant/inviting destinations and universal access.This will build a strong case for shared funding <br /> while illustrating the many shared benefits of an integrated design and project implementation approach. <br /> Public Realm Framework+Cost Evaluation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.