Laserfiche WebLink
7) That in May of 2016, the City adopted an ordinance amendment that established a <br /> minimum lot depth standard to ensure more usable/buildable space in rear yards of newly <br /> created lots (this new standard does apply to the Subject Property). <br /> 8) That a reduced front yard setback should help limit the number of potential encroachment <br /> issues and possible wetland fill violations on the Subject Property. <br /> 9) That the proposed twenty-five (25) foot front yard and side corner setback is in harmony <br /> with other parcels within the Brookfield subdivision properties and consistent with the <br /> Comprehensive Plan land use guidance of Low Density Residential. <br /> 10) That economic circumstances alone do/do not create the practical difficulties. <br /> 11) That the plight is/is not due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property. <br /> 12) That the plight is/is not created by the Applicant. <br /> 13) That, if granted, the Variance will/will not alter the locality's essential character. <br /> 14) That, if granted, the variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to <br /> adjacent property. <br /> 15) That,if granted,the variance will/will not have the effect of allowing a use that is prohibited <br /> in the applicable zoning district. <br /> 16) That, if granted, the variance will/will not unreasonably increase the congestion on the <br /> public street. <br /> 17) That, if granted, the variance will/will not adversely impact the degree of public health, <br /> safety and general welfare provided for in the Ramsey City Code. <br /> 18) That, if granted, the variance will/will not diminish established property values within the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> 19) That, if granted, the variance requested is/is not the minimum variance necessary to <br /> accomplish the intended purpose of the Applicant. <br /> 20) That, if granted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is <br /> denied to the owners of other land in the same district. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by , <br /> and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> and the following voted against the same: <br /> Resolution #16-10-181 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />