Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION#16-10-184 <br /> A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A VARIANCE TO CUL-DE-SAC <br /> LENGTH IN THE PROPOSED PLAT OF BROOKFIELD 8TH ADDITION AND <br /> DECLARING TERMS OF SAME. <br /> WHEREAS, Brookfield Land, LLC, (Permittee), has properly applied for a variance from <br /> the maximum cul-de-sac length prescribed in Section 117-614, Subd. (c)(3) on portions of the <br /> property legally described as follows: <br /> Outlot A, Brookfield 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> Or upon platting and recording: <br /> Brookfield 81h Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> (the "Subject Property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission met on October 6, 2016, conducted the public <br /> hearing and adopted Findings of Fact 40969 relating to the request for a variance from the <br /> maximum cul-de-sac length on the Subject Property. <br /> NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF <br /> THE CITY OF RAMSEY,ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows <br /> 1. Based on Findings of Fact #0969, a variance to the 600-foot cul-de-sac length, as <br /> established in Section 117-614, Subd. (c)(3) of the Ramsey City Code, is hereby granted <br /> for the Subject Property. <br /> 2. The variance allows for a cul-de-sac to be constructed to an approximate length of 1200 <br /> feet. <br /> 3. No construction of any building shall commence without the issuance of a building permit. <br /> 4. The Permittee shall be responsible for all City costs incurred in administering and <br /> enforcing this variance. <br /> 5. This variance shall automatically become null and void if it is not initiated within twelve <br /> (12)months of the date of approval,unless an extension is granted at the written request of <br /> the Permittee. Approval of the plat of Brookfield 81h Addition shall be considered as <br /> initiation of the variance. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br /> and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />