Agenda - Council - 04/22/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

'J'O TR~P SI~D.]I.~ENT (AN EROSJON AND SED]tlEN'FAT]ON PL^N 5H~LL BE ,SI. IBM]TTED PH]OR TO COI'~YJ'HUCTJOI'~ ON ALL S],OP]'~ GHEATER THAN ~2% J~>',IU~J~,S,S~I~G THE CALCUI,t~'fED AN'fIC]P/VfED GHOSS SOJL 1,()55 (EXPRESSED IN ?'ONS/ACHE/YE~) BO'fH DUH1NG AND ~"J'ER COI~S'J'HUCT]ON. Page 69, paragraph 2: The applicant can demonstrate that deYelopment during and after constroet~on can be accomplished without ~ncreasing erosion, and %bat there is proper utilization of controls to. reduce rm~off to non-destrnctive levels. Page 71, paragraph ll: /un erosion and sed~menl, atSon control plan ~ndicating the t~pe~ location, and necessary technical informalion on control measures %o be ta~ken both during and after construction including a state.,en% e>:press~ng the ca]cu]aled anticipated gross soil loss expressed in ton/acre/year both during and after construciion.. "'In response -to your paragraph l( c),. please refer to page 71, paragraph '9 of reference (a): A landscape j)]an drawn %o An approprSate scale, including dimensJ, ons and disiances and %he location~ t.Tpe~ size, and descr~p't4on of all e):5st~ng vegelaiion, clearly locai4ng and describing any vegetatfion proposed for removal and all proposed landscape materials w~ich be added %o the site as par% of %he developmen%. Further, refer to page 72, paragraph lf~ and page 7~, "river setback" of reference (a). Page 72~ paragraph 14: A description of the method to be provided for vehjcu_]~r amd pedestrian access to the proposed development and public access to' the river and/or public river view opporttmities both before and after development; a description of the development's i-moact on e×isting views of and along the river. In response to you}- paragraph l(d), the City sees no need for a sea plane policy as the river is not navigatible for such a craft. In :r'esponse to your paragraph 1 (e) 1, The City is realigning, defining and de].~neating th~.s line on a map and all of the Critical A~ea will be in the URi-V,.I~ SERVICE AREA.,. and the City is in the process of adopting the WiRd smd Scenic Ordinance. · In response to your paragraph l(e)2, the answer %o this is that when the Urban Service Area line is changed the rural open space will be non- applicable. In response to your paragraph l(e)3, please refer to enclosure (1) and (2). In response to'your paragraph l(e)4, refer to page 40, parag-~aph. 1 -- (The City ~ntends to delete the 45 foot for co~ercial buildings as it is in conflict with o~Lr zoning code) , All residential development within the Critical 7Lrea shall be limited in height to 35 feet and 45 feet for Commercial. Page 2