My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/01/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/01/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:26:12 AM
Creation date
3/14/2017 12:22:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/01/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission 5. 5. <br /> Meeting Date: 12/01/2016 <br /> By: Chris Anderson, Community <br /> Development <br /> Information <br /> Title: <br /> PUBLIC HEARING: Considering Ordinance #17-01 Amending Sign Standards for the Employment Districts to <br /> Allow a Second Ground Sign on Parcels with Multiple Road Frontages <br /> Purpose/Background: <br /> In 2010,the City amended the sign regulations relating to the Business Districts (B-1 and B-2)to allow a secondary <br /> permanent ground sign on parcels with multiple road frontages. At that time, it did not seem that there was a need to <br /> contemplate allowing a secondary ground sign in the Employment Districts since they are not generally oriented <br /> toward retail uses sought out by the general public. However,the City has had a couple inquiries over the past few <br /> years about the potential of a secondary ground sign that were not possible without the issuance of a Conditional <br /> Use Permit due to the limitation of one (1)permanent ground sign per parcel,regardless of the number of road <br /> frontages. <br /> Notification: <br /> A notice of public hearing was published in the Anoka Union Herald,the City's official newspaper, in accordance <br /> with state statutes. <br /> Observations/Alternatives: <br /> Generally speaking,the sign standards for the Business Districts and the Employment Districts are essentially the <br /> same with the exception of the number of allowed permanent ground signs (there are additional provisions for <br /> various sign types in the Business Districts that are specifically geared toward some of the permitted uses within <br /> those districts). There does not appear to be a compelling reason to continue to maintain different standards related <br /> to the number of ground signs allowed on a parcel based on whether a business is located in a Business or <br /> Employment District. If a parcel in one of the Employment Districts has multiple frontages and the business <br /> believes that a secondary ground sign would be beneficial,the Zoning Code should not be an obstruction. <br /> In the Business Districts (B-1 and B-2),parcels with multiple road frontages are permitted to have up to two (2) <br /> permanent ground signs. One permanent ground sign can be up to twenty-five feet(25') in height and cannot exceed <br /> 100 square feet per exposed face nor an aggregate gross surface area of 200 square. A second permanent ground <br /> sign is permitted up to a height of twelve and a half feet(12.5')and cannot exceed fifty (50) square feet per exposed <br /> face nor an aggregate gross surface area of 100 square feet. The Ordinance under consideration would add this same <br /> provision for parcels with multiple road frontages to the Employment Districts. <br /> Staff is aware that there are broader policy topics regarding signs (process, design standards, etc.). However,this <br /> ordinance has a degree of time sensitivity due to a specific request. The broader policy discussion is likely to take <br /> some time to unfold, and Staff does not want to hold up this smaller scale amendment. <br /> Alternatives <br /> Alternative 1: Recommend City Council adopt Ordinance#17-01 amending the sign regulations for the <br /> Employment Districts to allow a second permanent ground sign on parcels with multiple road frontages. There does <br /> not appear to be any compelling reason to have more restrictive standards for the number of allowable ground signs <br /> in the Employment Districts than the Business Districts. The Zoning Code should not be a barrier for those <br /> businesses with multiple frontages that desire to have a second ground sign in the Employment Districts. Staff <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.