Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION#16-12-226 <br /> A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A VARIANCE TO THE FRONT <br /> YARD SETBACK FOR AN EXISTING HOME AND PROPOSED DECK ON THE <br /> PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14950 PERIDOT ST NW,OTHERWISE KNOWN AS LOT 6, <br /> BLOCK 5,PINEVIEW ESTATES,AND DECLARING TERMS OF SAME. <br /> WHEREAS, Tara Wostrel and Justin Linder (Permittee), have properly applied for a <br /> variance (the"Variance")from the City of Ramsey (the"City")to the front yard setback in the R- <br /> 1 Residential (Rural Developing) District on the property generally known as 14950 Peridot St <br /> NW and legally described as follows: <br /> Lot 6, Block 5, Pineview Estates, Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> (the "Subject Property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission met on December 1, 2016, conducted the public <br /> hearing and adopted findings of fact relating to the request for a variance to the front yard setback <br /> requirements for an existing home and proposed deck on the Subject Property. <br /> NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF <br /> THE CITY OF RAMSEY,ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows <br /> 1. Based on Findings of Fact#0974, a Variance to the front yard setback for an existing home <br /> as well as the construction of a new deck within the required front yard setback area on the <br /> Subject Property is hereby granted. <br /> 2. That the dwelling and deck on the Subject Property shall maintain a minimum front yard <br /> setback of twenty-five (25) feet from the public road right-of-way. <br /> 3. No construction shall commence without first obtaining a Building Permit from the City. <br /> 4. That this Variance shall automatically expire if the use is not initiated by December 1, <br /> 2017 and issuance of a Building Permit for the deck shall constitute initiation. <br /> 5. The Permittee shall be responsible for all City costs incurred in administering and <br /> enforcing this variance. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. <br />