My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/01/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/01/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:26:12 AM
Creation date
3/14/2017 12:22:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/01/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Gladhill explained the City would be reviewing a landscaping <br /> plan in the next step. <br /> Curtis Foster, 7121 1481h Lane NW, asked how property values would be impacted by the <br /> proposed project. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill explained staff does not have any empirical evidence <br /> that the project would negatively affect property values. He believed there was enough <br /> separation that this would not be a concern. He explained City staff could speak with the <br /> Council anecdotally regarding the adjacent property values. <br /> Commissioner Brauer stated he wouldn't mind living next to the proposed facility given the fact <br /> there would be little noise or traffic and there would be a good-sized buffer in place. <br /> Chairperson Levine requested comment from the applicant. <br /> Reid Schulz, Landform Professional Services, introduced himself to the Planning Commission. <br /> He discussed the success of Troy Halverson and National Self Storage. He thanked staff for their <br /> assistance with the Sketch Plan. He explained this plan was not requesting a variance within the <br /> buffer yard. He reported he was willing to work with the neighbors and would not be <br /> contributing to any of the drainage concerns. He described how a hammerhead turnaround was <br /> used and questioned the benefit of the hybrid cul-de-sac that was being proposed by the City. He <br /> explained he was more than happy to dedicate land to the City for a cul-de-sac but stated he <br /> would be seeking a reduction in the park dedication fees if this were to proceed. It was his <br /> recommendation that the cul-de-sac not be required. <br /> Commissioner Bauer asked if the two large garage doors would accommodate semi-trucks. <br /> Mr. Schulz indicated the two larger doors would allow for climate controlled access into the <br /> facility for patrons visiting the site during the winter months. He described how access would be <br /> controlled by the gates and noted now outdoor storage would be allowed. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy questioned how the pond would be accessed. <br /> Mr. Schulz described how maintenance vehicles would access the pond through the stub street. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated in the past there was openness for the <br /> applicant to dedicate property to the City. He explained he would be interested in holding further <br /> conversations with the applicant regarding the cul-de-sac. He understood the cul-de-sac would <br /> be awkward in shape, but the City saw value in completing this project. He recommended staff <br /> speak with the applicant and bring forward a recommendation to the Commission at a future <br /> meeting. He suggested the Public Works Superintendent attend the next meeting to review the <br /> cul-de-sac concerns in further detail with the Commission. <br /> Commissioner Surma questioned how high the proposed building would be. <br /> Planning Commission/November 3, 2016 <br /> Page 5 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.