My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/05/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/05/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:27:11 AM
Creation date
3/14/2017 12:27:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
01/05/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
need to remove them. Many membrane structures, especially those designed for residential use, are not intended for <br /> long-term use as they do not withstand the elements for long periods of time. As a result,they can become an issue <br /> of blight. <br /> The Subject Property,while on Highway 10,is not impacted by the Highway 10 Access Planning Study that was <br /> adopted by the City recently. It will not be affected by future improvements within this corridor like many of the <br /> parcels further east, especially on the north side of the highway. Additionally,the City's Strategic Plan contains a <br /> Strategic Initiative to improve the image of key corridors, including Highway 10. Erecting and maintaining a <br /> membrane structure in clear view from the Highway does not seem to be in concert with this strategic initiative. <br /> The Applicant's business appears to be doing well and growing in this market. This is evident now with the lack <br /> showroom space for their growing product line.While Staff wants to see continued growth for this business,there <br /> are concerns with the request related to the exterior finish and the location of the Structure. If a long-term solution <br /> were in place that would eliminate this need in future years, Staff would be more supportive if the Structure were in <br /> an alternative location that is less visible from Highway 10. <br /> Alternatives <br /> Alternative 1: Motion to recommend City Council adopt Findings of Fact unfavorable to the Applicant and <br /> recommend denial of the IUP request. Historically,the City has considered membrane structures as non-compliant <br /> with Zoning Code based on exterior finish requirements. Approval could be viewed as contradictory to past(and <br /> ongoing) enforcement actions. Improving the image of key corridors, including Highway 10,has been identified as <br /> a priority by the City. The proposed location of the membrane structure would be in clear view from Highway 10, <br /> which would seem to be inconsistent with this initiative. Finally,this approach doesn't resolve the larger issue of <br /> inadequate indoor showroom space for the Applicant's needs and has the potential to become an annual request(or <br /> at least be requested again in the future). <br /> Alternative 2: Motion to recommend City Council adopt Findings of Fact favorably to the Applicant and <br /> recommend approving the IUP request contingent upon the Structure being sited in a different location on the <br /> Subject Property,which is not so clearly visible from Highway 10. Staff understands the potential need for this <br /> temporary structure leading into the upcoming boating season. If the Structure were positioned further north on the <br /> Subject Property,where the principal building and/or existing trees may provide some screening of it from the <br /> highway,that would at least be more in line with the initiative to improve the image of Highway 10. Staff would <br /> still note though that a more permanent,long-term solution (i.e. improvements/expansion of the principal building <br /> to provide additional indoor showroom space) is needed to avoid this becoming a routine request each winter. <br /> Alternative 3: Motion to recommend City Council adopt Findings of Fact favorable to the Applicant and approve <br /> the IUP as requested. The exterior finish of the Structure does not meet the minimum standards for the B-2 <br /> Highway Business District. However,alternative materials may be approved by the Planning Commission and City <br /> Council.While approval of alternative materials is permissible, approving a membrane structure for additional <br /> space beyond the timeframe of a Transient Merchant License creates a mixed message to the community about <br /> installing and utilizing these types of structures. Staff understands the Applicant's intent and would be more <br /> supportive of the request if there were a long-term solution in place (i.e. improvements to their existing building, <br /> this may be an annual request)to ensure that this does not become an annual request. <br /> Funding Source: <br /> All costs associated with this request are the Applicant's responsibility. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Staff is not supportive of the request as proposed. <br /> Action: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.