My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:27:24 AM
Creation date
3/14/2017 1:32:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/02/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
developed. Application of these best management practices for forestry activities is intended to insure <br />protection of the floodplains, significant existing vegetative stands, tree canopies, native plant <br />communities, and scenic views and vistas. <br />Subpart 5. Nonmetallic mining. This subpart prohibits new nonmetallic mining within the shore impact <br />zone, bluff impact zone, and required setback areas. There are a number of aggregate mining and <br />extraction operations in the southern portion of the MRCCA. Local units of government had requested <br />the ability to continue to allow some nonmetallic mining through conditional or interim use permits. <br />Consistent with these requests, the standards allow local regulation of nonmetallic mining while <br />minimizing the impact of potential mining and extraction activities within the MRCCA. Both existing <br />mines and any new nonmetallic mines must, however, meet established standards for location, site <br />management, and reclamation. These restrictions are consistent with the Interim Development <br />Regulations adopted under Executive Order 79-19 and existing local government requirements. <br />Subpart 6. River dependent uses. The MRCCA governing statute presumes that the MRCCA will <br />continues to be used for multiple purposes, including use as a transportation corridor, an economic <br />resource, for water supply, and for storm water and wastewater treatment facilities. Minn. Stat. § <br />116G.15, subd. 2 (2015). For this reason, river access within certain districts must be maintained and <br />shoreline facilities, private roads, and conveyances serving these uses are exempt from structure <br />setbacks, subject to the provisions of proposed Minn. R. 6106.0180. The standards set out in this <br />subpart apply to these facilities as well as to other parking areas and structures, and the placement of <br />dredged material within the MRCCA. The subpart also makes clear that dredging and placement of <br />dredged material within the MRCCA requires a DNR permit for work in public waters. Additionally, <br />activities in the immediate riverfront area are solely limited to those that must be placed near the river <br />for operational reasons. <br />Subpart 7. Wireless communication facilities. Local governments currently regulate the placement of <br />wireless communication facilities, including towers. This subpart ensures that these regulations <br />minimize the visual impacts of towers and restricts their placement in sensitive natural areas. <br />Additionally, new facilities must demonstrate that functional coverage cannot be provided through co - <br />location, a lower tower, or a tower located outside the MRCCA. <br />6106.0120 Dimensional Standards <br />Subpart 1. Purpose. To protect primary conservation areas from development impacts, this part <br />establishes dimensional standards for structures within the MRCCA. <br />Subpart2. Structure height. The height restrictions set out in this subpart are designed to allow <br />development within the MRCCA while protecting "views of and from the river" as directed in Executive <br />Order 79-19 and as set forth in the National Park Service's MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan. <br />Structure height is one of the factors that varies the most by district, and has been the subject of <br />considerable discussion and public input. In establishing the proposed structure height limitations, the <br />DNR considered a variety of factors, including existing regulations, natural and scenic resources, existing <br />and planned land uses, and standards already in place in local government ordinances. <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.