Laserfiche WebLink
These treatment standards ensure that runoff from impervious surfaces in the water quality impact <br />zone will meet current standards. The 10,000 square foot threshold is consistent with standards <br />used by the Capitol Region Watershed District. The area of this threshold is roughly equivalent to a <br />30-space parking lot. <br />Subpart 8. Development on steep slopes. To address the impact of land alterations on steep slopes (i.e. <br />slopes between 12 and 18%) this subpart retains the best management practices for development set <br />forth in Executive Order 79-19. Most local governments in the MRCCA have adopted ordinances that <br />include these provisions. <br />Subpart 9. Compliance with other plans and programs. Many watershed management organizations <br />and watershed districts exist within the MRCCA, and each prepares its own water plan to <br />comprehensively address water quality within its watershed. Most local governments also participate in <br />the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and have local floodplain ordinances to reduce the risk of <br />flood damage and loss. Finally, most local governments also have local wetland ordinances under the <br />Wetland Conservation Act to protect wetlands within their jurisdiction. This subpart requires all <br />development in the MRCCA to comply with these local water plans and floodplain and wetland <br />standards, which focus on protecting these key features and resources in the MRCCA. <br />6106.0170 Subdivision and Land Development Standards <br />Conventional subdivisions, with their uniform lots and blocks, are inadequate to achieve the purposes of <br />the MRCCA. The division of a tract of land into individual lots without regard to the corridor's natural or <br />cultural resources often leads to fragmentation and degradation of natural vegetation and habitat. <br />Land development patterns within the MRCCA over the past 35 years have historically been guided by <br />the general performance standards and guidelines set forth in Executive Order 79-19. These standards <br />and guidelines encouraged "the clustering of structures and the use of designs which will reduce public <br />facility costs and improve scenic quality." In addition, local governments and regional and state <br />agencies were directed by Executive Order 79-19 to "develop plans and regulations to maximize the <br />creation and maintenance of open space." Additionally, developers were required to dedicate a <br />reasonable portion of "appropriate" riverfront access land or other lands for public use when developing <br />residential, commercial or industrial subdivisions within the MRCCA. Executive Order 79-19 also <br />permitted contribution of cash in lieu of land as an alternative to land dedication. <br />Executive Order 79-19's general performance standards and guidelines for subdivision and development <br />within the MRCCA were advisory and have not consistently resulted in the intended preservation of <br />open space. Proposed Minn. R. 6106.0170 seeks to correct this shortcoming by requiring either <br />conservation design or other alternative design standards within the MRCCA. <br />The inclusion of alternative design standards such as conservation design in the MRCCA rules is intended <br />to protect the multiple resource values of the MRCCA while providing a framework for future <br />development of those large private landholdings that remain within the MRCCA. <br />Conservation design is a valuable tool for protecting water quality and wildlife habitat when <br />appropriately applied, and also provide amenities to residents. An evaluation of 50 matched pairs of <br />62 <br />